340-S Chicago's latest activity
-
340-S Chicago posted the thread [Found!] Looking for a 73+ steering center link in Cars and Mopar Parts Wanted.I'm looking for a 73+ steering center link. -
340-S Chicago reacted to junkyardhero's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .+1 shirt size cuz the arms don't fit no more
-
340-S Chicago reacted to Inertia's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .Then add 6* caster, lol
-
340-S Chicago reacted to junkyardhero's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .they weren't factory for our cars, but for E-bodies they were. yeah, 16:1 manual box with the QR arms on the street is not anybody's...
-
340-S Chicago reacted to 4mulas's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .I’m pretty sure Quick ratio arms are aftermarket not factory. Yes the factory, if offered, would have a different worm and sector in...
-
340-S Chicago reacted to 72bluNblu's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .Factory manual steering boxes were either 24:1 or 16:1, the fast ratio boxes were 16:1 and were offered only on A-bodies from ~1965 to...
-
340-S Chicago replied to the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms.The TTI instructions (and follow up call) was the original source of my confusion. Between that and a couple other conversations, I was...
-
340-S Chicago reacted to 4mulas's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .Wow, it’s good to see these side by each! To the OP - I believe TTI references that some of their products are NOT intended for use...
-
340-S Chicago replied to the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms.This explains my original confusion. Thank you! I think I'll try to find a way to sqeek out a few more millimeters and run it. It's...
-
340-S Chicago reacted to junkyardhero's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .you are correct, the fast ratio arms are longer than stock (by 1 1/2" iirc) and they only work with the 73~76 centerlink. the fast ratio...
-
340-S Chicago reacted to Inertia's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .I think you'll find 1/8 to be adequate, if not, you can elongate the bottom idler pivot bolt hole slightly to gain a little clearance...
-
340-S Chicago reacted to Kern Dog's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .Yeah, there is a noticeable difference in the length.
-
340-S Chicago reacted to Jeremiah (jd)'s post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .I had that combo for a while. It wasnt bad.
-
340-S Chicago reacted to mod5v's post in the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms with .The "Quick Ratio " arms were intended to go on a standard ratio box. Also they were initially intended to be used on "E/B" body cars. Im...
-
340-S Chicago replied to the thread Quick Ratio vs Standard Pitman and Idler Arms.I have manual "quick ratio" steering.
