73' B3 340 Duster pro touring build

I now wonder if perhaps they built the 340 based engine and suffered a cracked or broken crankshaft, and then later found one of the elusive "thick wall" early 360 castings and built a second (and much more reliable) combination for the car, and simply didn't advertise the fact that the first engine failed. Who knows ? I'm not at the track all the time anymore, (and neither are any of those guys-even the ones who are still kicking)so I don't have anyway of finding out. Anyway, there is no question that you possess a very significant piece of history there, in that engine. Tom was one cool and very down to earth guy; and a real hardcore performance nut, that is for sure.

It would be easy to tell by looking at the casting numbers on the block. It will either say 340 or 360, correct?