Thank you.
Those numbers came from a well known magazine builders sf bench....Which shows how **** changes..wether it be procedure or the equipment.
My bench is stingy and I like it that way.
on my bench those same heads flowed like this..
.100. 73
.200 137
.300 204
.400 246
.500 274
.550 281
..........
Btw I got these heads flowing these numbers by putting seats in the intakes and keeping the short turn steeper than most would invision for those numbers....in turn it took roof work to make to even it out, 186 cc intake runners. If you looked at the ports...you have a hard time not wanting to lay the turn back more...lol there is more left in them, but i like where they are for what I'm doing. The point I'm making here is that the deviation/difference in numbers, to me, indicates it is more than just a difference in flow benches...I think Hughes is full of **** with some of their numbers.
