Mopar mopar forum
 HOME  FORUMS   FABO STORE   MEMBER PHOTO GALLERY  CHAT  MEMBER CLASSIFIEDS  MOPAR VIN DECODER   REGISTER
 VIDEO GALLERY  NEW POSTS  TODAYS POSTS  SEARCH  CALENDAR  B BODY MOPAR FORUM  E BODY MOPAR FORUM

Go Back   For A Bodies Only Mopar Forum > Automotive Technical Forums > Small Block Tech



318 Mopar vs. 340 Mopar

Small Block Tech



 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2008, 04:02 PM   #1
goatboy
Member
 
goatboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: missouri
Posts: 51
318 Mopar vs. 340 Mopar

I have a 71 dart with a 225 slant 6. I am thinking about putting a v8 in it. After looking at what it would cost to build the 225 I think I might be happier with something bigger. What I am looking at right now is going with a 318 or a 340. Could someone tell me the benefit or difference between the two. Thanks
goatboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 04:08 PM   #2
DERICKS
Senior Member
 
DERICKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CLINTON TOWNSHIP,MI
Posts: 363
The 318 is more readily available, cheaper and most performance parts are applicable. The 340 is what I have and would not trade but I have been lucky in having a core lying around. For the money and availablility why not build a 360 for the extra stroke and cubes??? makes a good torquey street motor all the way up to a nice race piece and easier to find than a 340. I guess it all depends on your cash flow, what you may have lying around in parts, and what performance you are looking for.
DERICKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 04:08 PM   #3
340butterduster
Mopar Addict
 
340butterduster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baden,Ont. Can.
Posts: 1,598
340butterduster's Flag is: Canada
340 are scarse and getting pricey, 318 are abundant and cheaper. If you want more power go with a 360.

My .02.
Giles
340butterduster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 04:26 PM   #4
70dart
Senior Member
 
70dart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fredericton,New Brunswick
Posts: 1,784
Send a message via MSN to 70dart
Canada

There's quite a difference here is two links that will help to define the differences
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/318.html
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/mopar340.html
70dart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 04:31 PM   #5
mooser
273 Commando Kid
 
mooser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 116
I was also debating this. (with my 74 duster 225 slant six).

I decided to go with the 318 because, with the 340 or 360 you are going to need an 8 1/4 rear end and with a 318 you can use your stock 7 1/4 and also as mentioned all the parts and the actual motor itself are cheaper and easier to find than the 340 stuff.

hope my 2 cents helps
mooser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 05:27 PM   #6
goatboy
Member
 
goatboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: missouri
Posts: 51
thanks guys I am so glad the internet is here, You guys have been alot of help. I think I will keep an eye out for both the 318 and a 340 see which one comes my way. Thanks again
goatboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 05:57 PM   #7
69 Valiant Kid
Senior Member
 
69 Valiant Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 590
goat boy, i have a 340, i was originally getting a deal, engine and trans for $1200. i had to do 1000$ in machine work. if i had to do another one, i would build the nastiest 318. just because thats the kinda guy i am. and having 450hp out of a 318 would be sweet. but youd be spending money their too. the small blocks just fit better than the big blocks as far as making things fit in and around components. if you want headers and such.
69 Valiant Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 06:52 PM   #8
yellowdartdave
Senior Member
 
yellowdartdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jax, Fl.
Posts: 1,643
Gain some torque.... do a 360!! 40 cubes more than a 318 means more bottom end, etc.
yellowdartdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 07:12 PM   #9
rumblefish360
Dynamic duo at the ready!
 
rumblefish360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Centereach L.I.N.Y.
Posts: 12,920
rumblefish360's Flag is: United States
Well, it boils down to what ever comes your way first? Then I'd wait for a 360. I did a 318 in my '74 Duster and I'm not complaining an Iota, but it is hard to ignore a 42 cube jump and most of it all is in torque.

The 340 is an expensive item to get just in the block itself.

IF you get a 318, you can get them to move well. It'll just move a whole lot better with a 360. The only thing a 360 can do that a 318 can is get better mileage (on equal parts of course)

318 pistons are a tad higher than a 360's. All else is equal really.
rumblefish360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 07:23 PM   #10
mooser
273 Commando Kid
 
mooser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 116
Am i the only person that realizes he has a /6 car so probably has a 7 1/4 rearend therefor if he gets a 340 or 360 he has to upgrade to at LEAST an 8 1/4 while if he gets a 318 he can use his 7 1/4.
mooser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 07:26 PM   #11
Wilnutt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 465
if i were to do if all again, i would look into a fuelie 5.2, or 5.9
Wilnutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 08:17 PM   #12
66dartgt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: chgo suburbs
Posts: 752
Mooser, no disrespect intended - but a mildly built 318 will blow up a 7 1/4 just as easily as a 340 or 360. Trust me, I know - I did it once in an old diplomat.
66dartgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 08:22 PM   #13
abodyjoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Berlin,N.J. 08009
Posts: 5,878
abodyjoe's Flag is: United States
Send a message via AIM to abodyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by goatboy View Post
thanks guys I am so glad the internet is here, You guys have been alot of help. I think I will keep an eye out for both the 318 and a 340 see which one comes my way. Thanks again

don't forget about the 360. easy and cheap to buy and the longer stroke helps in the TQ which is great for the street. just as easy to bolt in as a 318 or 340
abodyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 08:48 PM   #14
6pk2goDemon
"X" Factor Member
 
6pk2goDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,869
6pk2goDemon's Flag is: United States
The 340's are getting very pricey to come by and to build. Remember they haven't been in production since '73.

If you're doing a street car, the 340 pistons are nearly impossible to find at any compression less than 10 to 1 or higher. We looked for 3 months or more just to find new forged 8.5 comp pistons for our 340 Demon. We wanted street use w/ pump gas.

I like the 360 idea as others have suggested. 2nd choice would be the 318

Just my opinion.....good luck w/ the build.
6pk2goDemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:04 PM   #15
Longgone
John/68 Barracuda & Dart
 
Longgone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newport News, Virginia
Posts: 6,870
318`s were really not built around performance, most are lo-po 2 barrel engines while 340`s (68-71) came with 10.5 to 1 compression, windage trays, forged steel cranks, double roller timing chains, 2.02 intake valves, 3/4 cams, HD valve springs, and dual plane intakes. I`m sure I`ve overlooked things too, but you get the idea. No matter which engine you choose to replace your slant 6 with ,whether it`s a 318, 340, or 360 you will need to build the rest of the car to match. The car will get heavier, go faster, and handle less nimbly so an upgrade to brakes, cooling, suspension, and other drivetrain parts will/may be necessary. My vote would be to find a 360 as a building block. They`re still easy to find and have a lot of potential. Figure in some extra bucks though for upgrades to the rest of the car.
Longgone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:06 PM   #16
grimreaper
Senior Member
 
grimreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gillette, WY
Posts: 652
grimreaper's Flag is: United States
My first vote would be for a 340 stroked to 416. (All forged and wild!) My second, and way more feasible, vote would be some version of the 360. More commonly available and cheaper to get good street power from. Third would be for the 318. 318s can and do make great engines but will cost you more for a similar result with the 360. 360s are probably the easiest to get your hands on too. Have you read this before????And, as has also been mentioned, figure on an upgrade in the rear axle department as well. A decent running 273 will rip the pinions out of the frail 7-1/4.
grimreaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:15 PM   #17
340sFastback
Senior Member
 
340sFastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,956
The torque of a 360 is what makes it a great street motor. And the later 360s have the magnum heads and roller cams already installed.
340sFastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:25 PM   #18
69 Valiant Kid
Senior Member
 
69 Valiant Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 590
any burnouts and the 7 and 1/4 gears are ghandi, if you will.
69 Valiant Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:44 PM   #19
MOPEkidD-3
Sick legit, bra
 
MOPEkidD-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Monument, CO
Posts: 1,342
MOPEkidD-3's Flag is: United States
I want to build a high-compression 360 Magnum for my '70 Duster in the future. Iron Ram Magnum heads (home-worked), flat-top zero-deck slugs (10.5:1 comp.), Lunati Voodoo cam, and other goodies, hooked to a Passon A-833 OD and an 8-1/4" rear. Of course you could go with something milder, but 360's are fantastic motors no matter what you do.
MOPEkidD-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:56 PM   #20
charger70
Senior Member
 
charger70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Minnesota, TEMPORARILY!!!
Posts: 569
I like the 360.
I had a 72 Swinger 360 4bbl mild cam, 904, and an open 2.94 gear 7.25. Where it really shined was on the open road crusin 70-75. And with the small valves and hard seats it ran on 87 cheepo all day long, gettn 18 mpg.
It was my only car for 6 years. Had a hitch on it and used it for towing.
I only raced it a few times but was rough on it on the street, barking the tires into second gear often. Sold it with 140000 on the same rear it came with. If ya want a 1/4 miler ya gotta step it up but for a mild 360 cruizer the 7.25 could last quite a while giving ya time to save up the funds for the tuff rear ya really want.

That same motor ran 14.8 at 93 in my duster with a 727 and 3.23 8.75rear.
charger70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: New Mopar Milodon intake/lifter valley baffle pan SB Mopar 66340SEDAN Mopar Mechanical Parts For Sale 9 04-15-2010 12:36 AM
67-76 A body mopar console dart cuda duster mopar FABO eBay Feed Mopar Interior Parts For Sale 0 04-12-2010 07:50 PM
Used Mopar A-body Seat Belts - 1972 Black Mopar FABO eBay Feed Car Parts For Sale Archive 0 02-16-2010 10:40 PM
67-76 A body mopar console dart cuda duster mopar FABO eBay Feed Car Parts For Sale Archive 0 02-13-2010 09:50 PM
For Sale: Mopar Big Block Newer A/C Compressor Adapter Mopar Performance? 383 440 66340SEDAN Car Parts For Sale Archive 2 11-24-2008 05:17 PM


FABO SPONSORS

Limited Edition FABO T-Shirt

Mopar T Shirt

LAST CHANCE! Get Yours Today!


Dales Cuda Shop
Rosevilla Mopar Parts
Charger Specialties
Performance Suspension Technology
Inertia Motorsports

1960-1976 Plymouth Valiant - 1963-1976 Dodge Dart - 1964-1969 Plymouth Barracuda - 1971-1976 Plymouth Scamp
1970-1976 Plymouth Duster - 1961-1962 Dodge Lancer - 1971-1972 Dodge Demon - 1971-1981 Valiant Charger (Australia Only)


air suspension | suspension parts

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.25856 seconds with 12 queries