What is a 361 big Block ?

-
Predecessor to the 383, Was used in the late 50's and early 60's . Looks like a 383. Different bore and stroke.
 
Same stroke, 3.38.
2.08 intake valve, 1.74 exhaust valve
These engines can perform but we're allwas left behind since the 383 came out.
The only part of the engine that is now a custom part is the Pistons and mayyyy be the rings depending on actual bore size.
After that, it takes on every regular performance "B" engine part.
 
So would it be the same weight as a 360 ?

Odd choice to shoe horn into a Demon..

Sparce # of pictures and none really of the interior. engine nor frame..

Price is interesting...
 
Would be heavier than the 360LA engine. Probably only a few pounds lighter than the 383. Basically the same as putting any B or Rb in an A body.
 
Actually the 361 has the same stroke (3.38") as all the other B engines (350, 361, 383, and 400). Surprisingly there are a lot of them around. The 361 came out in 1958 and was available in cars thru 1966(?). But it wasn't dead after that as it hung around as a truck and industrial engine for years after that.
 
My 1st car,
A Mopar of course was a 66' Charger and it came with a 361c.i. motor. I often wonder what happened to that beast. Coulda made a Triple X on the stuff that went on in that fold down back seat. Lol
 
Anybody check out the ad? "915 single chamber heads, 'elderbroc' carb and 355 welded rear end" guy doesn't sound too on-the-ball I'd be a bit leery
 
Yep. 361 was usually a 2 barrell in 4 door family cars and not a huge performer. Mopar went bigger, with a bigger cam, 4 barrel, and dual exhaust and created a pretty good running big block. I owned a 69 coronet back in the day that someone put a 361 in. It ran pretty good with a 4 barrel, dual point and headers. tmm

View attachment my Coronet resized.jpg

View attachment My 69 coronet.jpg
 
A while ago when I first heard about the 361 I just thought somebody made a typo and meant to write 360 LOL
 
361

Don't sell the 1962 361/305 HP 'Police Package' short.

Bore ..... 4.125"
Stroke... 3.380"
Compression .............. 9.00-1
Camshaft 'Hydraulic'.... .444"/.456"

These 'Police Packages' came thru with Dual Exhaust, a Dual-Point Distributor, a High-Lift Camshaft, and a 'specially calibrated' Carter AFB.

They were 'screamers' in the NHRA {10.60 to 11.29 Wt/HP} Class.
* 1963 ~ 1964 ~ 1965 ...C/SA
* 1966 ........................ D/SA
* 1967 ........................ C/SA

That Engine Combination was a Record Holder with the Torqueflite in
the 1962 Dodge Model 440 and 1962 Plymouth Sport Fury from 1963 thru 1967.

They were kind of written off at the Drag Strip starting in 1968,
but they still showed up at the Track banging away.
* 1968 ............. F/SA
* 1969 ............. G/SA
* 1970 ~ 1971 .. H/SA

Starting in 1963, they were only available as a 361 2-Barrel.

Plymouth used them up to 1965 in the 'base upgrade' B-Body.
Dodge used them up to 1966 in the 'base upgrade' B-Body

Dodge started to use them as the 'base' Truck Engine. They
were very strong and durable, with a good amount of Torque.
 
Don't forget. The B wedge had a shorter stroke than a 350 Chevy. They all ran good.
 
I had a 361 in a '62 Dart which was a B body car back then. Changed the cam and added a b motor aluminum intake. It was a screamer for it's time.
 
I just tried out a '61 polara with a 361 in it...
 
Chrysler introduced the 350 and 361 in 1958, 361 is basically a .060 over 350 and was first only available in trucks and then was put into cars. Then the 361 became the 383 as early as 1959. They even made fuel injected versions in 1958 only.
 
I've got a '63 361 long block, from carb to pan, bolted to a Torque flite tranny, sitting in my shop... Looking for a donor car
 
My son and I had nearly twin cars. I had a '66 Coronet 500 with a 361, Mopar Performance ignition, factory 4-bbl intake, Edelbrock carb, RV cam, stock exhaust manifolds with dual pipes through stock mufflers. My son had a '66 Satellite with the exact same setup, and both cars had 3.23 gears on the same stock-size radial tires. The only engine differences were my heads had a mild port and polish and a .040 overbore, while his was stock.

Both cars went to the track quite often. His times were high 14s to low 15s. My times were mid to high 15s. On the highway, his Poly 318 got 18-20 mpg and my 361 averaged 14-15 mpg.

The stock 361 heads did not flow well with the small valves, even with the porting, and the exhaust manifolds were very restrictive. A set of stock 452 heads and '68 or later exhaust manifolds would have probably knocked off more than a second ET, and obviously, a better cam and headers with good flowing mufflers would have done even more. However, I doubt the gas mileage would improve much. The Poly design is simply more efficient.

This was thirty years ago, so it would be much easier to find performance with modern parts.
 
Yes! The Poly was more so much way more efficient @ mileage and so much more superior that the continued production until....
 
Soooo many 361's were mistaken for 383's,, same as 273's and LA 318's of the late 60's
 
I was pleasantly surprised how well the 361 moved my 62 Newport.
 
My first drag car was a home built C/A running a high compression 361 that was .060 over 11:00:1. It ran high 11 low 12. Cast iron torque flutes that would last one weekend. Won class often and eliminations once. It was 1963/64 if I remember correctly. Couldn't hurt the 361's. Dan
 
I had one in a 66 Belvedere II - put a 4 on it and it would burn the tires all day.

Bcudamatt
 
Same here. In the 60's friends of mine ran a 59 Plymouth Savoy 361 called Mister Period. Ran 14 flat to high 13's.
 
-
Back
Top