Thumpr cam crap

-
Don't know Tony so the grasshopper term was a generalized description for the thread...not an invite to troll . Hope that wasn't the purpose of the comment...:(

I was makin a joke. "Grasshopper" as you used it, means someone who is young, green and inexperienced. Tony is anything but. I just got a chuckle out of it. 70aarcuda is Tony.
 
I'm looking at these thumpr cams rite now, they recommend you upgrade the springs lifters and timing chain with them, ergo you would need different sized push rods as well, so maybe the overly rough idle could be a pushrod issue, not opening long enough for its intended duration? Just a thought.
 
I'm looking at these thumpr cams rite now, they recommend you upgrade the springs lifters and timing chain with them, ergo you would need different sized push rods as well, so maybe the overly rough idle could be a pushrod issue, not opening long enough for its intended duration? Just a thought.

No need for different pushrods. The rough idle comes from a few things. Duration, LSA and overlap to name three. It's not a physical thing. It's an air flow thing. You need matching valve springs for any camshaft you choose.
 
so maybe the overly rough idle could be a pushrod issue, not opening long enough for its intended duration? Just a thought.
the rough idle
after the tune is right
>Is mostly due to the very late closing intake, that allows the piston, at idle, to push a portion of the just-inducted intake mixture, back up into the intake manifold. This messes up the plenum AFr, but also increases the pressure in there, decreasing the vacuum, and making it difficult for the carb to meter properly at low rpm.
>Pistons on the exhaust stroke can be connected to the intake plenum, during the overlap cycle,and the headers will pull mixture straight across the piston and out into the pipes.
> with a single plain intake, the pistons on the intake stroke can pull exhaust gasses from another cylinder that is on the overlap cycle, which reduces vacuum yet further.

But if the tune is bad;
a high required idle can be the consequence of a poor T-slot sync, usually because the blades are too-far closed. because the ignition timing is too far advanced.
In nearly all case the shake is from one of two things;
1) a poor AFR or
2) an excessively high pressure in the chambers, due to the high advance. At low rpm, those very strong pulses hammer the crank. The cure is as easy as retarding the timing. Back to something more normal. This will reduce the pressure, as it chases after the descending piston.
At idle, your engine will tolerate a lot of advance, maybe in the 40 degree range. With a low pressure engine lots of Idle-Timing works. But as the cranking cylinder pressure increases, you gotta cut it back, because of the very strong power pulses. This is especially important with a manual trans, as
the car tends to become undriveable at that low rpm. Again the cure is less Idle-Timing.
But as others have said; the metering-rod carbs are a little unhappy at those very low manifold vacuums.
So your first defense is retarded to normal timing, then a DUAL-Plain intake, and finally is a Holley-type PV carb.
Of course the valves actually do have to close,lol. and the rings have to be loose enough so the pistons can go up and down without too much dragging; because as the Idle-timing is reduced, the power will be reduced.
Just for comparison, my 11/1, 367/4-speed, idles at 500/550 in first gear, pulling itself around the parking lot, with just 5 degrees of idle-timing. But it has a hard time with any grade at all or soft spots. But it takes all of the bucking away, until just before it stalls.This with a Hughes 276/286/110 cam/61* overlap.
 
the rough idle
after the tune is right
>Is mostly due to the very late closing intake, that allows the piston, at idle, to push a portion of the just-inducted intake mixture, back up into the intake manifold. This messes up the plenum AFr, but also increases the pressure in there, decreasing the vacuum, and making it difficult for the carb to meter properly at low rpm.
>Pistons on the exhaust stroke can be connected to the intake plenum, during the overlap cycle,and the headers will pull mixture straight across the piston and out into the pipes.
> with a single plain intake, the pistons on the intake stroke can pull exhaust gasses from another cylinder that is on the overlap cycle, which reduces vacuum yet further.

But if the tune is bad;
a high required idle can be the consequence of a poor T-slot sync, usually because the blades are too-far closed. because the ignition timing is too far advanced.
In nearly all case the shake is from one of two things;
1) a poor AFR or
2) an excessively high pressure in the chambers, due to the high advance. At low rpm, those very strong pulses hammer the crank. The cure is as easy as retarding the timing. Back to something more normal. This will reduce the pressure, as it chases after the descending piston.
At idle, your engine will tolerate a lot of advance, maybe in the 40 degree range. With a low pressure engine lots of Idle-Timing works. But as the cranking cylinder pressure increases, you gotta cut it back, because of the very strong power pulses. This is especially important with a manual trans, as
the car tends to become undriveable at that low rpm. Again the cure is less Idle-Timing.
But as others have said; the metering-rod carbs are a little unhappy at those very low manifold vacuums.
So your first defense is retarded to normal timing, then a DUAL-Plain intake, and finally is a Holley-type PV carb.
Of course the valves actually do have to close,lol. and the rings have to be loose enough so the pistons can go up and down without too much dragging; because as the Idle-timing is reduced, the power will be reduced.
Just for comparison, my 11/1, 367/4-speed, idles at 500/550 in first gear, pulling itself around the parking lot, with just 5 degrees of idle-timing. But it has a hard time with any grade at all or soft spots. But it takes all of the bucking away, until just before it stalls.This with a Hughes 276/286/110 cam/61* overlap.

That's more like it.
 
AJ,
post #56. The cure is NOT to cut back on idle timing. The cure is to use Vac Adv as I explained in the 'How to..' section. That is the beauty of VA: it is load sensitive, not rpm sensitive. As load increases, the extra timing provided by VA drops way...
 
AJ,
post #56. The cure is NOT to cut back on idle timing. The cure is to use Vac Adv as I explained in the 'How to..' section. That is the beauty of VA: it is load sensitive, not rpm sensitive. As load increases, the extra timing provided by VA drops way...
The max you can get from the Mopar V-can is 22 to 24 degrees.
 
OK, didn't know that. I built a 440 about 16 yrs ago. I demonstrated the benefits of MVA & the owner said, 'Gotta have that!!'. Could not find any adj Mopar VA units here. But GM adj units are easy to get & they go to about 30*. I ended up up using a GM points dist that I modified to take a Chrys reluctor & pick up. Triggers a 4 pin Bosch module, which is similar to the GM HEI module. Machined an adapter to fit the dist to the 440.
Gets some strange looks at car shows............
Dist is still in the engine today.
 
And what's your definition of a "street car"? :rolleyes: Heeeere we go...

Many people would not consider my cam streetable (1100-1200 rpm idle, 8" vacuum) but I don't have any problem driving it around town and on club cruises. 9 mpg highway and a 10 gal fuel cell does limit the length of trips though :D

Anyhow, I didn't pick the cam for the idle, but for the midrange and top end capabilities in my 451. The manly idle sound is just a bonus:p

 
Last edited:
I'd say there's 4 types of street car engines, Street, Warm Street, Hot Street, Radical Street. Cam wise something like 200-210, 210-220, 220-240, 240-plus.
My guess when people say street engines their mainly talking about Street and some Warm Street and most would normally considered Hot and Radical engines to be Street strip.
 
My conclusion is about the same
that is to say, a range of 5 cam sizes; namely
248/240/232/224/216
My current cam, at 230 is right in the middle, and I like it.
My previous cam was a 223, and I liked it better.
I tried a 248, and didn't like it at all, the power was waaay to far up the rev range.
I like your category rating. That 292/292/108 definitely fits into radical street.
 
My combo I run in my d150. 360 magnum, .030 forged flat tops with 2 valve reliefs. .001 in the hole. .039 headgasket. EQ heads worked by brian hafliger. Comp mutha thumper cam installed 4* retarded. Mopar m1 single plane. Holley hp series 750. 15/8 hedmans. 727 10" 3600 converter. 3.55's. I have no issues with it idling at 850rpm in gear. Power from the hit. OP has issues. Might be too much for a low compression teener. (My guess)
 
Its all down to tune, back in the day I ran my all iron 440@only 10:1cr with an 850DP and a 290@.050 sft cam in@104, 12 initial and 37 total, it idled@just under 900rpm, you could count the cylinders firing, I thought it was quite a mild cam.
 
Good thing I looked at the thread post date before responding. :rofl:
 
-
Back
Top