unclepunchy
Well-Known Member
Wait, am I crazy, those terminals look the same as the one in my hand, no? What is the difference?
Missing or broken hardware, or the field itself has an internal shortWait, am I crazy, those terminals look the same as the one in my hand, no? What is the difference?
Hmmm.......Maybe the assembler put the insulating washer between the holder and the alt frame, when it should have been between the mounting screw head and the terminal?? Not sure what to say??Wait, am I crazy, those terminals look the same as the one in my hand, no? What is the difference?
The part number says it is setup for single field wire. Nothing wrong with the alternatorI would take it right back to the store, and take your multimeter with you. Check the replacement. This is a well known problem on isolated field alternators, AKA either the rebuilder was sloppy and broke or left out the insulators for the brushes, OR THE FIELD itself has a sort to the rotor body. OR they do so on purpose, attempting to sell later units to fit the early applications. This is a dangerous strategy as you just found out
Wait, am I crazy, those terminals look the same as the one in my hand, no? What is the difference
Would not matter the hole on the terminal is just large enough for the screw. As best I can tell from the photo.Hmmm.......Maybe the assembler put the insulating washer between the holder and the alt frame, when it should have been between the mounting screw head and the terminal?? Not sure what to say
Who or how was this part number determinedWILSON - 90-03-2007
It appears that this company simply moved the black isolation washer from under the screw&lock washer and put it under the holder body, thus grounding that terminal, a quick & easy "conversion". Had You attached the green & blue wires in reverse, the alternator would've full-fielded, & charged 18-19volts boiling the battery.Wait, am I crazy, those terminals look the same as the one in my hand, no? What is the difference?
Cheat sheet: First picture in post #15 shows the insulators and brushes for isolated field roundback and 1st gen squareback.This kit has both terminals in it, I don't know which one you need.
EXACTLY!First picture in post #15 shows the insulators and brushes for isolated field roundback and 1st gen squareback.
I'd say Dana's correct, that's a grounding style holder, going back to the 1st pics. There would be the same terminal retention hole in the tab as the other brush if it were meant to have one attached , and the holder body is narrow, so even tho' We can't see the insulating ring's presence I'd say it's not there. Get the '73 brush kit... it's really poor form to manufacture a dedicated grounding brush with a tab large enough to actually attach a terminal to, what could go wrong there???...oh, YOU found out, glad Your car didn't catch fire.Wait, am I crazy, those terminals look the same as the one in my hand, no? What is the difference?
you said a mouth full there.it's really poor form to manufacture a dedicated grounding brush with a tab large enough to actually attach a terminal to
Disagree. The customer cannot know what the part number means. The second terminal should have been REMOVED or modified to prevent this very problemThe part number says it is setup for single field wire. Nothing wrong with the alternator
EDIT. Look carefully at the top brush. The screw appears that it will contact the electrical tab directly. There needs to be an insulator UNDER the screw head and on top of th electrical terminal, AND that insulator MUST have a shoulder to center the screw inside the terminal to keep it from contacting.Ya, looks like the part of the post broke off. Here is a shot if both terminals.
View attachment 1716121153
View attachment 1716121155
Customer better start knowing what parts he / she is ordering.Disagree. The customer cannot know what the part number means.
I agree, the reman guys need to do a better job of removing the extra terminal, BUT there is still nothing wrong with the alternator for the cars it is specked for. I could bolt it into my 67 Dart and I would have only one field wire to attach to the one un modified field terminalThe second terminal should have been REMOVED or modified to prevent this very problem
we have gone over that already several times.EDIT. Look carefully at the top brush. The screw appears that it will contact the electrical tab directly. There needs to be an insulator UNDER the screw head and on top of th electrical terminal, AND that insulator MUST have a shoulder to center the screw inside the terminal to keep it from contacting.
Yep new holder and maybe another insulator washer for under the head of the bolta, looks like the part of the post broke off. Here is a shot if both terminals.
That horizontal brush holder is for a revised squareback.Ya, looks like the part of the post broke off. Here is a shot if both terminals.
View attachment 1716121153
View attachment 1716121155
what if the alt is a revised? we still have never seen the entire alternator?That horizontal brush holder is for a revised squareback.
in a nut shell what's the issue with that holder? (just curious and too lazy to look it up)I wouldn't use that if I could help it for reasons posted in the '69 replacement thread and elsewhere.