You gotta love peoples "car knowledge"

chevys are dookie logs on wheels.

pontiacs are just garbage barges & have WAY HEAVY rotating assemblies.

oldsmobile's are septic tanks on wheels & have glass bottom ends that grenade over 5500 rpm.

buicks, well....who the hell want to drive one of those???? BUT at least they had the 430 wild cat motor to destroy the moldsmobile & ponticrack guys.

Ya can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear...
and you can't polish a turd, so...

thats why mopar rules!

signed, stupid juvinile

Dear Mr. Juvinile.

Whether you believe it or not back in the days when Musclecars were rolling off the lines they all made fast cars and I honesty don't think any one particular marque was better than another. It's just all in what you liked and wanted. I've seen every brands top dog beat the other brands top dog musclecar serveral times over. I believe that in the hobby that we are in at this point in time, we should not be bashing other makes and start banding together before the government legislates our cars to a museum rather than letting us drive them. That said, I've never owned a Mopar until 2 years ago. I've always been a GM guy but I liked this 65 Cuda so I bought it. I've had a bunch of Chevys, a few Pontiacs, 2 Buicks, and one Olds 442 and I liked em all. I wouldn't turn my nose up at any other brand either if the price was right. I'd love to have a 67 or 68 Cougar or stang, early Javelin or AMX? Yup. You need to get your head around the fact that nothing on the road is cooler than an old musclecar, no matter what factory it came out of.

P.S. I help run one of the biggest Chevy sites on the net (Chevytalk.com) and when I bought my 65 Barracuda I never got one bad word from our members. Actually I got a ton of support about it and still do. A car is a car, it's just a chunk of iron.

Regards
Red