This is what I get.......

Since it's Pontiac, keep it that way. You'll have to change the frame mounts, exhaust and get another transmission. Not to mention little stuff like locate brackets and stuff. I have always liked those cars. The round headlight 70s models, not the Bandit cars. I wish you we closer, you could come over drink some ice tea with me while I build you a new Pontiac motor. I'd be glad to do it to meet a new friend. I HAVE a 1999 350 Chevy vortec engine with the really good 062 casting vortec heads that I am not going to use. I even have a turbo 350 short tail shaft transmission. I just got done not long ago reassembling the short block with all new rings and bearings. The heads only need assembling. Would take me 30 minutes. You could have all that for 350 bucks and I would even finish the engine for you...you'd need to buy a few things like oil pump and the like and the transmission is only a good core. It needs building.......but you'd have good chevy power. Those little vortecs are stump pullers. But if the car was mine, I'd stick with Pontiac.

Yeah, too bad you're in Georgia. That's a bit of a trek.

That does suck!

I have a gm v6 I am not sure if it is 3.8 or 4.3 and a trans that you may be able to bolt in without much work. I have had them for a few years but dont know anything about them. They came in a 1922 Dodge Brothers coupe that I bought, I pulled them out to put in a Plymouth drivetrain.

Here is a pic of the motor. And also a pic of my last Trans AM.

Pm me if you may be interested in the motor.

That's a good looking TA. I'll think about that engine, but would prefer to drop in another V-8.

I think that holds true up until 1977 when the Pontiac motors couldn't meet the new EPA rules so they used Olds and GMC motors sparking a bunch of lawsuits , my 77 grand prix daily driver is a lawsuit car- 350/350 olds 4bolt /4bbl passed by making more power from less fuel proving high performance does'nt always equal more pollution


I know that in 75' they started alot of emissions controls on the TA's, but you're prolly right about when they started using GM engines in 77'.