318 Compression ratio

There are several other things that figure into this, such as valve size and valve lift/duration. Typically smaller ports maintain flow velocity at a higher level if all else is equal.


Depends on where the cam comes on. If it is a higher rpm type of cam, then the Thermoquad ought to work, especially with a slushbox.

For your consideration:
The high compression 273 HP used a 625 AFB.
The 340 used the AVS and Thermoquad (don't have cfm ratings handy).
The low compression 318-4 cop car motor used a Quadrajet.

In fairness, the de-smogging of each engine is progressively more stringent.

The 67-70 318 stock pistons come closest to the deck. Summit will sub them into a later model kit if requested at no extra charge.


My Demon has a warmed up 318. Engine block is 68 318 with a 73 front cover and balancer. Block deck & heads lightly planed for good seal (less than .010 removed from each). With the heads, pistons, and gaskets used, I've calculated a 9.38:1 compression ratio. It has cleaned up 302 heads and a Crane hydraulic cam 218/228 @ .050 lift. The top end consists of a Performer intake with a 625 cfm AFB. IMO it's a stout street motor with good throttle response. It wakes up around 2000 rpm which works for me.

I've read into the ThermoQuad and there are two types with either smaller primaries or larger ones. 800cfm for the smaller ones supposedly. They used them for the small blocks the other ones for the big blocks. The secondaries are the same size in either one. I'd need a pretty high duration cam to use one then?

Also using the smaller 1.78 valves would keep good flow velocity correct?

Are those pistons you mention the Federal-Mogul 1.745 compression height?

You use a thin head gasket? Would that duration at.050 you used work with a ThermoQuad? Or do I need something more radical?