Junkyard BEAST!

No biggie on the cam Joe. I don't have problems with flat tappets and frankly, I'm not all that impressed with the hydraulic rollers. They will always be limited to a ramp speed no faster than a hydraulic flat tappet and simply put, the solid flat tappet will be more streetable and make more power for every given size. Just out of curiousity, what did your car run off the bottle?
I've watched a friend run 12.30s in his all steel Dart running 360, 3.91s and a 9.5" convertor that flashes to 2500. The 360 was a 9:1 LA based 360, the MP solid (.528 lift, .488 at the valve after lash), an M1 single plane and a Holley 750. No nonsense. Not expensive. And it has run it since the mid 90s.
I'd be looking at a flat tappet solid shelf grind. Something like the XE268s which doesnt need a terribly heavy spring and will not only rpm but have a very solid torque curve. Something that doesnt need a high stall to work well.

Moper, if you had to, what do you recommend in the hydraulic roller realm of cams? I don't even know if this motor will rpm (have no idea if low comp motors are limited in that regard?) I already have the roller lifters and would love to be able to use off the shelf synthetic oil instead of trying to hunt down old rotella and using additive

Also, im really hoping that I can get 9:1 compression. My block is a 91 LA, not sure what they came with from the factory in terms of compression. your friends combo sounds similar to mine except ive got an air gap manifold and 4.10's with the 4 speed

If my combo ran that good id be exatic...what heads is he using and what is he shifting at?

How far are those pistons down the hole (deck height )?

Im not sure to be honest. I took the engine apart without even measuring since plans were different when i was disassembling

I have also looked at the EQ heads, and they are great for the price. I just like how Brian sets his up, and for the price and performance they are hard to beat, especially for use in the future:thumleft: