which is more streetable-comp cam?

I will be using one of the 2 cams listed above, I know they work...a 268 or 270 aint gonna cut it, this has convinced me that u can run a larger cam with lower comp contrare to what we've been told and still perform well, I am not blowing smoke on how well this engine ran and performed and I think with either cam and 9-1 comp would be capable of mid to low 11's easily for both cams have have ran mid 10.60's -10.90's in 440 with 10.9comp and 11.3 comp but with steeper gears-slicks-fuel-etc with iron heads in 32-3400lb cars at the track....being that I will be tagging and insuring the 71 dart for the street I want to be able to run pump gas and drive it and for it to perform well as it did in 69 dart..the Frank Lupo Dynamic convertor aint no punk with a stahl rating of 25-5500 rpm and the suspension is far superior and weight is lighter and it is a 440 so torque isnt an issue...as for the 906's whoever ported them knew what they were doing for I believe this is the real key to why this 8.7 comp engine worked so well....unless I've miscalculated the compression...it was a nasty lil'beast for comp ratio, and the 562-300-265 comp solid cam callls for 10+ and up comp...steeper gears..good convertor..etc..I am not being defensive or disputing anyones opinions or advice or recomendations as for I have asked u all what ur input or thoughts are cause I am suprised as to the performance level of this 440 with this large of cam [562-300]and lower [8.7] compression but it worked great in wore out 69 dart..was it the 4spd...4.10 gear...good heads...or the combo and my concern in the transplant to the 71 with the 3.73s and automatic was and is the comp ratio which I can bump up to 9-9.4 fairly easily and still run pump gas and would the slightly smaller cam work better for the street or stay with the 562-300??? bring on the comments and dont think I'm defensive for I am not meaning to be just wouldnt have thought this combo shouldve performed this well...thanx....Ken