This is just an example so I have a better idea of how the opposing opinion works. No offense is intended to any of the parties.
So lets say for example, 604 Racing sold his Dart to Badart and finances the car. Then lets say Badart can no longer make payments so he hides the Dart from 604 Racing who just wants his car back if he isn't going to get paid. In this example lets say 340plot knows where the Dart is, but its none of his business so he says nothing. So 604 Racing is out the money and the car, and Badart has the car without paying for it. Do I have it right? Is that the way its supposed to work? Is that justice? Did 340plot do the right thing in this example?
