Swapped to 528 mech cam slowed down

Adam,
I guess that because the fact that he lost .2 tenths in his 60' times means that he's spinning real bad, and every time that I have seen a car spin this bad the mph just wasn't there, as the track becomes shorter and the car cant recover the speed that it would have had, had it not spun. I agree that if the car hadn't spun so badly that in all reality the mph should have gone up and not down. Generally in my cars, if they spin a few hundreths I would see a increase in mph and not a decrease, but because the fact that he's off .2 full tenths due to the loss of traction that the car IMO just doesnt have the momentum going for it to make the speed that he did run. As the length becomes shorter and the way that I see it is when the tires finally do catch up to the race track and the car starts to recover and move the track is shorter and the amount of distance to build speed isnt there.
Just as when a pro stock or fuel car spins the tires and they have to lift the ET is way better than there mph to cover the same distance. They just did this a week or so ago on NHRA Race Day when Mike Dunn was driving Doug Herbert's car and they had a stock car in the other lane, Mike Dunn and the stock vehicle left at the same time on the tree and Mike shut the fuel car off and coasted while the other car stayed under power all the way, both cars ran 88 mph yet the fuel car covered the distance quicker something like 10.50's and the street car went 16 sec., I hope I'm making sense and not confuseing you.
My point being that 88 mph doesn't yeild a 10.50 et as it should be closer to 128 mph.