New LED tail lights 69 Cuda

My .02...(As an student of the engineering disciplines)

Dan is right. In this increasingly litigious society, you gotta cover your a$$, and there's no two ways around it. He's also trying to make sure that people aren't getting hurt. Period.

And...
From an empirical (observational) standpoint, there's a LOT of LED trash out there. I remember my friend Chris putting LED's in his '74 Dart back in like '98 or '99. They were new, and expensive. They were also dim as hell, and had near zero viewing angle. On the brakes, you could almost tell that they were on, and if you lined yourself up correctly, they WERE bright as could be. Too bad that was about a foot and a half off the ground. There's a LOT of this trash still out there!

And....
Spaghetti really could have done a much better job answering the question at hand...Saying "yeah, well, doesn't matter" really does not inspire much confidence. Personally, not being direct and concrete with an answer is a huge pet peeve.

However...
As mentioned, apologies go a long way to showing someone's willingness to think about things behind the scenes.

BUT...
Even if they're not cert'd, even if they're not 100% up to spec, even if they could be better...I think that Spaghetti's products are probably still better than what a huge lot of the now-35-plus-year-old cars out there have now (I have NOT seen them first hand). Not better through OEM defect or poor design, but by simple age.

Dan, I respect your fact-based-opinion more than you know, but I really do doubt that 5% of the Mopars on the road have dead-stock lighting that is any closer to passing spec now than these LED's. And stock meets spec for as-new and so there's no liability, even if it is sub-par.
I think it behooves every Mo-owner to clean the lenses inside and out, purify the grounding system, run fresh clean wire (with relays when needed) to power all external lighting, and so on and so forth. I really do get jumpy when the mags talk about electrical upgrades (I've always wanted to run Harley HID's in my Dart, and test the output for spec), but I don't think most people have the knowledge, cash, willpower, and/or foresight to go through with making lighting that's top-notch. I know the sockets for the tail lamps in my Dart are corroded and broken and nasty and I don't know where to get what I need to make it better and I'm a huge spec-nerd, too! It frosts my a$$ every time I look at the rear of my car, because I know the lights back there suck.

Given that...I think Spaghetti could handle things a little better, but I don't think that what they're doing is a bad thing at all, because most owners don't get to see (and therefore think about) their own brake lights. I think pushing Spaghetti towards testing will DRAMATICALLY improve their product offering, but I'll take an un-tested reasonable LED upgrade over a dirty lens or weak ground any day, just by virtue of the fact that the guy with LED's is probably going to pay attention to those taillights more often, and therefore keep them in better shape. He paid money for them to be bright, and by God, he's gonna ***** when they're not.

We all know that the only people that see Mopar taillights are Chevy guys, anyways.