Have not seen one, don't want to. Don't care how "good" of a car it is, if it does not even remotely resemble the "real" Darts, any generation of them, it should not share the name.....
So the the new Dart debate, again begins LOL ... heres my only problem with statements such as this... what 'real Dart' are you referring to the new Dart resembling?... the 1st gen Dart (1961)? .. the 2nd gen Dart (1962, and a B body to boot.. and in my eyes the ugliest Dart ever built) .. the 3rd gen Darts (63-66)... or the 4th gen Darts (67-76)?? None of these generations of Darts really resemble the other.. in fact, not really at all.. Im assuming most people glorify the 67-76 Darts (and even then probably 67-72 more than anything).. but truth is again, the generations dont resemble each other.. so my argument that I have posted in other new Dart threads is this.. had the Dart generations continued on through the years, it probably would've ended up looking just like it does, and being the way it is through the advancements in fuel economy, technology, changing times, public interest, stylistic changes in era's... etc... It is what it is.. the 'glory days Dart' is gone.. thats what we're here for, to keep them alive and to enjoy the history and fun, of what was, at that time, the cheapest form of transportation in the Dodge line..