318 Heads: bad valve job?

Alex "Berkowitz";1970177724 said
Hi guys.

I´ve just picked my heads back from the machine shop, went checking it and found some "odd" stuff.

First: putting a straight edge on the top of the stems, all exaust valve tips are higher than intakes. The difference is around 0,039".

As I got the heads assembled, I measured the instaled valve height from the TOP of the retainers to the spring seats.

On one of the heads, 6 valves were at 1,7716", 1 at 1,7815" and 1 at 1,8012".
On the other head, there were also 6 at 1,7716", one at 1,7618" and one at 1,7815".

The difference at the retainers seems to be small, but at the tips, a bit too high.

Oh, I'm running Edelbrocks 5877 springs, wich should have a installed height of 1,65".
I don't believe the retainers are 0,12" thick, are they?


This is the first time I'm assembling an engine, and I don't really know what I should check next.

So, should ALL the valve stem tips be at the same height?
If they should, considering the mentioned heights at the retainers, what would be the right move?
Grinding the tips?

And about the valve height?
Is it ok, or should I run shims?

Just to mention, the cam is a SUM-K6901, 218°/228° @0.050", and .441" lift both intake and exaust.

Thanks!

View attachment 1714663319

View attachment 1714663320

View attachment 1714663321

View attachment 1714663322

View attachment 1714663323

View attachment 1714663324

View attachment 1714663325

What is this thread about again??

The different qualities of valve jobs and a good discussion on ways to achieve different/same results.

Hmmm.....don't think so. Op asked about valve heights, grinding the tips and shims....Don't see anywhere in his initial post anything about what stones/machine or process is better. I don't see how a discussion about which piece of equipment is "better" has ANYTHING to with the OP simple questions....Point is, while the discussion about machinery is interesting how is it relevant to "should I grind the tips?"....