Big Block Cylinder Heads "915 vs 906"

"915" Cylinder Heads on a 383

The 1968 and 1969 '383' had Flat Top Pistons with 10.0-1 Compression
with the top of the piston set 'above deck' @ .021".

And a 'factory' 'Shim-Type Head Gasket {.020"}

Despite that, it didn't stop many guys from attempting to pop on the
#915 Closed Chamber Cylinder Heads {swapping off the #906 Open-Chamber Heads}.

Sometimes it worked, and sometimes it didn't. It all depended on how the 383
Block {Piston Height} left the factory.

On a 'stock' swap out, if it worked, you gained about 1.1 in Compression.

If it didn't, the Piston had a 'party' with the Cylinder Head, and you usually
smashed the Top Land of the Piston, and ruined the Top Ring and smashed the ring-land slot.

I still have yet to find a replacement piston for such an application. Even the speed pro forged flat tops that many people use are mathemitcally 0.012" in the hole, and that's assuming the decks are machined to blueprint specs (which I'm told is less than rarely the case)...so unless I knock 0.030" off the block, it'll still be in the hole. Now, that being said, if I had pistons proud of the deck, using 906s would be preferable to me if I were going for stock heads...it would certainly open up a few more options.

In any case, I did a little number crunching regarding a flat topped 383 with open chambered heads...assuming true zero, true flat topped piston, and an 88cc chamber with an .030"x4.35" gasket, I got 9.3:1 CR. Not bad at all; certainly able to run a decently sized cam despite a 383s short stroke. But, cam timing events would be of utmost importance since no valve reliefs.

Sorry...got a little carried away with desktop engine building...