New Magnum heads for 347 with Flow data

RAMM said
I agree that these heads are not something I want to spend a ton of time on trying to turn them into something they are not. The intention here is to show that they are in fact quite a bit better than '302 castings. I feel guys here have been lead to believe that the '302 is the "END ALL BE ALL" head to seek out. I am trying to lay it all out there as clear as I can how a Magnum casting can be better in terms of flow/effieciency/torque/power/ and feasiblity(economics).

Dropping a set of EQ's on wouldn't be fair. Here's a link to a stock stroke 360 I built using EQ's. J.Rob http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/1208phr_371ci_mopar_small_block/

I forgot to ad that magnums are better than a 302 head unless you need a smaller port volume, for whatever reason that my be.

Facts , they are both are crackin sob's , most 302's ive seen crack all the way to the closed deck from the exhaust seat. Ive found 3 sets out of 8 that werent cracked.

In a way its sad people cant grasp that a magnum is like a 302 is in ported form.
But it cost more to use the magnum head.

Btw, im gonna call you, cause im pretty certain we are mostly on the same page and I bet there wouldnt be taking opinions sideways like on here.