340 Vs 360

That's not how it works in practice.

For an extreme example... If you take a 1bbl carb from a slant six and install it on a 440 it will still make more horsepower than the slant six did.

Prepare for more BS guys, When an engine needs to draw more air than the carburetor is rated for, It can and will flow more than CFM rating albeit at a higher pressure drop.

This means that the slant motor might have 1.5" Hg vacuum in the intake manifold at WOT but the 440 might have 4" Hg. the 440 WILL consume more air and make more horsepower, even though it isn't doing it efficiently.

In race engines they typically aim for 0.3" - 0.6" of manifold vacuum, just enough to get the carburetor to meter fuel while allowing for maximum airflow to the engine.

EDIT: this explains why you might see seemingly ridiculously oversized carburetors on smaller capacity engines. low manifold vacuum at WOT = efficiency.

But what if the people with the same cubic inches (all being equal) live at 6000 ft. above sea level? Then wouldn't the longer stroke of the two have more validation? Wouldn't a 318 stroked to a 349 have more torque than a 340 bored .060 over, all else being equal.... Ahhhhh, the X factory, altitude.......... lol