Time for a NEW car!!

never could figure out why they always compare supercharged to non-supercharged! why don`t they make the playin field even by none of them being blown. they could even add weight to the lite ones and then see what`s up. of course they`ll never do that!------------just tryin to think----bob:wack:

They compared the top dogs from each manufacture. It's not their fault that fiat comes up short. They compared the cars as can be bought. That is an even playing field.


For me it would be the mustang number one. Love that car. Driven a few. Rented a v6 rag top. Put a few hundred miles on it. Very impressive. Guy on moparts has a v6 with performance package and he has gone 13.8 in the quarter with it.

Second I'd probably go camaro. I like the looks more then the bloated challenger. Though I have never driven the camaro so that may change.

Third is the fat *** back of the pack challenger by fiat. Drove a srt 13 hours to South Carolina for a friend. I will say it is a good touring car. Handled well, those huge brakes stopped on a dime and it was practally idling at 80mph in 6th gear. But in the end I just don't like it it's too fat looking, sides are too flat looking and the rear us plain goofy loking to me. the lack of quality that car had was amazing. Then having to deal with a crappy Chrysler dealer to fight to get the crap fixed. No thank you. They can keep that tank.