is this true about a 350 sbc vs a sbm

And on a Chevy site somewhere there's a thread going on how superior the sbc is to the sbm.......especially the head bolt count and warped heads and blown head gaskets sbm are known for. The H.E.I. ignitions are good too, as a matter of fact, a lot of guys on here have threads going about how great it is and how to convert your mopar to it. Too bad that in stock form thew were only good for 6,000 r.p.m. just like our Mopars. They were just easier and more reliable. It can be argued that Chrysler wiring and electronics are substandard in our old cars as well. How about sub frame connectors? G.M. has been given a bad rap about their full framed cars versus the Mopar unibody which was vastly superior back in the day for handling etc. over G.M. and their crappy suspensions. However, everyone raves about how much better their Mopar handles, lauches, and feels after sub frame connectors are welded in which in effect makes the car a full framed car minus the rubber mounts.
Don't get me wrong, i am a die hard mopar fan, but sbc isn't as bad of an engine as you guys make it out to be.
And G.M. cars aren't as bad as you make them out to be.
But when it comes to factory suspensions, transmissions and rear end set ups, Mopar had it over them all.....