difference between these two cams?

999yards said

What would the noticeable (felt) difference between these two cams be?

Engine/car Specs:

car weight 3K? 1966 Barracuda

Tire size 26" sure grip 3.73 727 trans Have not picked out converter yet

Engine 408 stroker 10 to 1 compression. Nice old Street Dominator (thanks Rumblefish). Holley 950 dp mechanical secondaries. W2 heads offset roller rockers 1.5 ratio. 2.08 intake 1.65 exhaust forgot the cc's but they were milled down just a tad. Econo heads

1-5/8 stepped to 1-3/4 fenderwell headers Hedman.

The two cam recommendations so far. forgot to add this will be a hydraulic roller

Lunati 243-251 @.50 560-565 110ls 106

Bullet. 236-245 @.50 574lift 110ls 106

Thanks

Click to expand...

Roller cams have more area under the curve then FT cams, this produces power, That being said, I'd lean more towards the Bullet grind, Bullet has a great reputation when it comes to selecting cams for your needs, Now for instance, If you went with a FT hyd. to produce the same power as the Bullet Roller, you'd need a good 8-10* more dur, @50, so that would be a cam around 245/255 @50, thats a healthy cam wouldn't you think, The Lunati your talking 253/261 @50. This is why you see Roller cams with lesser Dur. #s vs. FTs & there showing the same RPM range, don't let that throw you off. That Bullet cam will see 6500 all day long.

My choice would be the Bullet, You'll be very surprised at the power it lays down, even with a 4" stroke.