Modman Maniac!
results -
No ambient temp or intake temp sender corrections used - tested on a 72 deg day. So it is what it is.
Also - this chassis dyno is pretty accurate for my car - Ive verified RWHP plus losses vs my track mph/ weight and it came in within 10fwhp!!
(PS if you're brave..next time you run on a chassis dyno..tell the operator to disconnect the air intake temp sender...you'll get a REAL rwhp reading with no silly corrections)
1st graph shows peak RWHP at 13.8 AF - previously the motor has shown peak HP at 12.69..so there may be a little more in it.
Drivetrain losses are easily 20% - thru 727 torqueflite auto, 3800 stall and 8.75 diff - so I make it around 450HP at the crank.
Second graph is comparison between single carb and dual carbs - no other changes - appx 30 RWHP difference ..or appx 45 Crank HP.
Thing I'm most impressed with is the torque increase....
results -
No ambient temp or intake temp sender corrections used - tested on a 72 deg day. So it is what it is.
Also - this chassis dyno is pretty accurate for my car - Ive verified RWHP plus losses vs my track mph/ weight and it came in within 10fwhp!!
(PS if you're brave..next time you run on a chassis dyno..tell the operator to disconnect the air intake temp sender...you'll get a REAL rwhp reading with no silly corrections)
1st graph shows peak RWHP at 13.8 AF - previously the motor has shown peak HP at 12.69..so there may be a little more in it.
Drivetrain losses are easily 20% - thru 727 torqueflite auto, 3800 stall and 8.75 diff - so I make it around 450HP at the crank.
Second graph is comparison between single carb and dual carbs - no other changes - appx 30 RWHP difference ..or appx 45 Crank HP.
Thing I'm most impressed with is the torque increase....