Figured I'd share.

Fat, usually when something is privatized it's done to save money, and have a preset annual cost. That cost includes everything, not just wages paid. For example, it includes the wages paid to the people who are replacing you, all of the administrative costs, all of the operational costs, and all of the misc. costs.

It also reduces the size of the staff needed to administer that money. Much of the staff, once needed to administer to the school's operations, can now be done by the bank, instead of a school employee or team of employees.

You'd also need to know the scope of the privatization agreement. Who is responsible for the up keep of the buildings, the utilities the buildings use, etc.

Usually, while salary costs might be higher, the entire package when viewed over the full scope of the arrangement results in a net savings to the people paying the bill.

Have you thought about applying for a job with the company that is displacing you. Usually they are pretty good at hiring people who are familiar with the environment they've assumed. Be aware that your salary, and your benefits package would probably be different, though.

I understand that it sucks being displaced, but, you might want to take advantage of an opportunity to remain employed in your field, at least until you find something else, if that is what you ultimately decide. TO my way of thinking, anything beats unemployment, even if it's something temporary, by my choice, or theirs.
Thank you Frankie. I will be applying with the replacement company. They will be paying more from what I am told. I understand what you say of the cost and that is why I dont understand this. The schools will continue the ownership of the buses, paying for all parts, fuel and buildings, tools, and upkeep. The new company is only supplying personel and thats where it ends. That is why they are showing an increase of over half a million by doing this. Trust me I ran a truck garage for 5 years before going to work here. Running the numbers just dont work if you are increasing the budget.

Under the new company we are also going from 3 supervisors to 7 and the board did question that cost. It is really stupid to do if there is no cost saving and an increase even with cutting legacy cost. The other districts I have talked with dont understand what the man has convinced the board to agree with. They agree with me once the voters get wind of a cut of over 1/2 million to teachers increasing class size then spending all that was saved on privatizing hurts the students and will probably create a revolving door for employees.