RustyRatRod said

Telling people how to make stupid, expensive decisions could be yours.

That's all for me. I am out. I kept this conversation civil as can be, straight on topic with good info and good dialogue and I'll be a son of a ***** if it didn't turn anyway. ToolManMike, I am surprised the most at you. That's what I get for trying my damndest to keep it civil and informative.

wazoo, you can cram it up your yahoo.

Click to expand...

roccodart440 said

IMO, that was way out of line mike, speaking only for my own comments I made as well as my cam recommendations I'd like to think that the people reading and some of those who commented may have a little better idea of cam choice and cam comparison.

Considering the cam specs I recommended were 110-114 LS and the same or similar duration at .050 as the OP's original idea for a cam (which was small) I was very clearly not shooting for max effort nor a 500hp fire breathing 273, which in itself would be a unicorn. I was in fact trying to get him the mild mannered engine he wanted while maximizing the cams function in that engine.

Click to expand...