Need slant heads for OHC project

Brandon Weaver said
Adding to the existing head isn't going to make a speck of difference though. You're still going to have an awful flowing head. OHC isn't some magic that will turn the slant into some high-revving fire breathing monster, unless you take the time to properly redesign the entire head. In which case, it is debatable that it will make enough, if any, difference over a pushrod motor to be worth the effort (am I making sense still?). More opinion, rotating assembly/oiling is where I'd look if i were wanting to spin something to the moon.

For example, the Ford OHC V8 was mentioned. It just so happens that I went with a buddy of mine to get his '96(?) 4.6 SOHC Stang dyno-tuned. Highly ported and polished Police interceptor heads (because apparently the stock SOHC heads are corks), Ford racing intake and longtubes, .500 lift with 114* lobe sep, and I believe 300ish* cam. I'm sure I'm forgetting other stuff. Anyways, he made 303hp at the rear wheels on JusTune's dyno. Around 350@ the crank. Oh, and this motor spins to 6300, same as a pushrod motor.

Like Pishta said, care to show us drawings?

If you're serious and want to do this personally, have at it. Oddball projects are neat, even if they are pointless. But please don't get peoples hopes way up only to drop 'em off a cliff lol.

High exhaust lift would be a huge plus with a turbo. HIGH boost, which I'm aiming for, will make the push rods a huge weak point. The low end is already being taken care of. I'm mainly concerned for the excessive boost. Now, higher RPM is desired for overspin without the motor blowing up. I would provide drawings, but I have yet to even start due to lack of time. Again, as I said, this is mainly a personal accomplishment project to see what I can achieve since no one has built this extreme of a turbo slant. Oddball is the goal, and if I do achieve even a slight difference, it's worth it in my books. Extreme porting, polishing, ceramic coating, and more will be done to the head to handle the exhaust temperatures and create higher exhaust pressure. What everyone is failing to realize, is that with a forced induction application, perfect flowing heads are unnecessary. The air is being forced through, and with smaller ports, I'll have a higher low end torque. Naturally aspirated, an OHC would be useless due to lower pressures. Combustion design is going to be the main factor I look into for the head. Valve size will be increased along with 5 angle valve job. Porting will be done. A head redesign is out of the question. $$$ is limited, but I have the necessary resources to do an OHC setup on my own without spending a fortune on custom machine work.

I'm not making any promises, these are all ideas I'm going to try out to see what I get. All I proposed was to pay for a junk head. I'm probably just going to end up using my own '65 head to prototype at this point and find a '68 head (better combustion design) to build. Im trying to eliminate as many weak points in the valve train as possible. I want to do this for myself because theories are great and all, but no one has solid evidence that an overhead cam won't give any additional improvements (yet). I believe I can achieve what I'm hoping for. Others might not. Until I prove myself wrong, I'm determined to do this.