Crank is shot, do I stroke it or not?

I thought this was a (respectful) discussion? It's a "stirred pot" because the options given were yours to your customer, and he asked questions about them on an open forum. Not because the options lack merit.

I am curious since you brought it up - how much does only reducing the rotating and reciprocating masses effect the torque output on a mild build between the start of the pull and 5K? With some time I could calculate it given the parts list but if you've already done that particular experiement I'd love to see it.

RAMM - My generalization was just that - simplifying to clarify the idea to more people. I am not debating whether a 4" arm will produce more torque at a lower rpm or more at peak. With respect to your builds - what parts would be different in order to complete the respective packages and attain the levels we're talking about? the OP posed the restriction of reusing everything but the crank, rods, and pistons. To me that means much of the possibility of the larger stroke goes untapped and therein lies my disagreement with the builder. In my opinion it will take adjustment of parts choices, otherwise known as spending more money, to realize that potential. In this I think you and I agree. In my experience, and based on the majority of my customers the single biggest issue is money. It's the most important part of the puzzle.

I have no dog in this fight. I don't own the car, nor am I pocketing any cash for building it.
-Naysayer©