i must be completely missing something ?!?

i must be completely missing something ?!?

When you put an 11.20 or better engine in a 13 second chassis, you get what you get.

j par said
I must be completely missing something here either that or people's memories are foggy as hell when they're talking about this 30 years ago they ran this or that time? just putting a cam and a torque converter and they're running 11.98 and 12.2's? I'm sure most are well aware of my combination and it's still relatively new and I have a little bit of tuning to do, no doubt, but? My best time so far is 11.88 ? I'll go ahead and restate my combination and maybe someone can tell me why I'm so far off/close to these relatively stock combinations? Or is the simple answer they're full of crap!??

I read this and it is EXACTLY what I expected. A bunch or derogatory insults and put downs towards people that have done a lot in drag racing, some for over 40 years. There are people that can and do with what they have, then there are the one that want to throw untold money at a crappy combo from the get go. Which do you want to be? There is a reason some of us don't respond anymore. If you can't guess what that reason is, I can't help you. :)

Where did anyone mention relatively stock. That's a figment of your imagination and you are missing a lot. A those 596 heads ported to flow 200cfm going backwards or stable with stock or 240+ with super strong low end numbers... hmmm Your engine makes some steam and the car is VERY weak in the first 330'

Remember making this comment?

j par said
initial is not where you are drag racing this car! you need to check your timing at all in like around 2500 to 3000 rpm's and it should be likely between 34 and 36.

Stick with that and you'll get far... SMH!!!