mp cams
BTW, it is DISGUSTIONG to go to the track and watch the MoPar stuff go so slow. They have all the go fast crap, but they are running low 12's or maybe mid 11's but you can see the aftermarket heads, manifold, headers all that crap. I call them underachievers.
Must be th new cams lolololololololol.
You know this is something I really don't get since I got back into the D-racing scene after a long lay off over the past 3 yrs, there's at least 4 cars I could give you specs of, just briefly, a '68 roadrunner with a 540 -1 motor, b/halved etc. etc., running 10.30's, a Duster with a 500ci running 10.30's, a '67 Notchback 'cuda with 13.1CR 493, -1 heads, roller cam etc. etc. running 10.30@130, a '68 fastback 'cuda with a victor headed 512 b/halved running a best of 10.44, I mean whats the deal here?...all cars hook reasonably well? but man thems is slow times!!, then you got my mate who ran the low buck Dart, 440ci, 12.7CR, eddy hds, .590 solid, factory iron rockers and goes 10.1 on SS springs, the block did come from the USA though.......my old '69 Cuda, stock 440sp motor with BV 906's, 9.8:1, big solid cam, 3000lbs, big tyre, way off from the parts these guys have today, I only ran it one time with the BV heads and went 10.7 and reckon it could've sneaked up on to a high 10.5 with some messing with, this is with what I call crap parts compared, rods/pistons that weighed 2lbs!!, crap CR compared but only 3>4 tnths off....and some of those motors in those cars were built by professionals!.......just don't get it, optimising your chassis comes into it but man you gotta have some HP there to start with!!!, they should be too quick for Super Gas!!....so there's nothing wrong with running old junk cams if everything else surrounding it works, as a lot of new stuff don't...........Saying all that there are some cars that run well though to be fair, a '68 Dart with a 505ci/glide at 9.1's and some others......
