Trick Flow Head dimensions compared to Stock Iron Head dimension

-
RKT

RKT

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
We are planning to use the Trick Flow heads on our low deck 400 in our early a-body. I may have a clearance issue between the master cylinder & valve cover using Trick Flow heads. Currently we are running stock iron heads with no clearance issues. In an effort to add additional clearance between the valve cover and master cylinder we will be using the Wilwood master cylinder along with the firewall relocation adapter plate. This will move the master cylinder over 7/8". I am hoping someone can tell me the Trick Flow head dimensions compared to Stock Iron head dimension. Unfortunately I do not have a set of Trick Flow heads to test fit. They cost a bit to much to just do a test fit.

Thanks for any and all imput.
 
Yes, I contacted Trick Flow. They are sending me the spec sheet from their engineering group. I'll post the info once I receive. Thanks
 
The TF heads are about 5/8 of an inch taller than cast iron heads. You can run short valve covers if you have a space problem. I'm using billet covers which are only 3 inches tall on my TF heads.

DSC_9660 (Large).JPG


DSC_9603 (Large).JPG
 
You shouldn't have any problems with clearance, especially with a B block and the offset adaptor. I'm running an RB and had no problems with Indy EZ heads or Indy 572-13 heads. And both of those heads are much taller than the stock heads.
 
440dartsport said:
You shouldn't have any problems with clearance, especially with a B block and the offset adaptor. I'm running an RB and had no problems with Indy EZ heads or Indy 572-13 heads. And both of those heads are much taller than the stock heads.
Click to expand...

I appreciate the info. Thank you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top