Throwing Up Some Seat Pictures................
I can tell you for fact the thickness is the same as the stock cover that came off at .031". As far as the stitching and etc., I guess it's a wait and see thing.
The front bucket seats that came with the car had the '69 "deluxe" covers. The rest is the interior was "standard" so it made sense (to me) to get the buckets looking the same. Both seats had "missed the mark" hog rings and the just tried again without removing the bad one. I did find way too many sharp areas on the seat bottom frames for my liking which I de-burred. The seat bottom rear corners were especially sharp so I rounded those off with a flap disc.
Here is a shot of what it was, both similar condition...................
Some folks aren't going to like it but this is in fact PUI, 69KSB10U, but it is what it is. I bought these covers at least two years ago. Hand written tag dated 1/28/14 attached. Wasn't long afterwards I start hearing complaints on their stuff but too late to return. They've been sitting in the box and I just never seemed to get the time (and/or nerve) to put 'em on. Over time I've heard "they are thinner", "the stitching is bad", etc.
I can tell you for fact the thickness is the same as the stock cover that came off at .031". As far as the stitching and etc., I guess it's a wait and see thing.
The front bucket seats that came with the car had the '69 "deluxe" covers. The rest is the interior was "standard" so it made sense (to me) to get the buckets looking the same. Both seats had "missed the mark" hog rings and the just tried again without removing the bad one. I did find way too many sharp areas on the seat bottom frames for my liking which I de-burred. The seat bottom rear corners were especially sharp so I rounded those off with a flap disc.
Here is a shot of what it was, both similar condition...................
