Valve lift question

That's not what I'm asking. After you calculate 1.5 or 1.6 or whatever, has anyone measured the lift at the valve and subtracted that from the cam lift? Such as...a .500" lift cam with a 1.5 rocker measured at the valve will not be exactly .500" lift because of imperfect valve train geometry.
A .500" valve (not cam) lift with a true 1.5 rocker, would have .3333---" cam lobe lift. Because of the lifter angle, the trig function shows the cam lift seen at the rocker to be .3234---", which would make the valve lift .485". The bigger the lobe lift, the more loss and a smaller lobe is obviously less loss. The rocker ratio will have no effect on the amount of loss if the rocker geometry is correct, i.e. correct pushrod length on a magnum and correct shaft height on the LA. Fwiw, the lifter/pushrod angle is not as problematic as it would seem.
If you were looking to get 1.6 at the valve, you should have kept the 1.65's. You would have been a lot closer.