318/360 production info

My 11/1 LA360 with a Hughes 230* cam and stock crank and rods is every bit as reliable as any stocker ever was. And it goes 93..... in the 1/8th...at 3650#. With a little less cam you wouldn't know it was hopped up. It has over 100,000 miles on it now, and has been pumping air since 1999.
The first point is; if you have to rebuild something, it might as well be a 360 with at least 350 to 400 hp. With high compression and tight squish, she can make great SBM torque,power and make some terrific hiway fuel-mileage too. And when you lean on it, stuff happens.......
And the second point is;don't let let yourself be lulled into thinking that a stock engine is somehow more reliable than a performance combo. At typical street power levels, this is seldom an issue. Our SBMs can easily handle one to one point two hp/cid for 100,000 miles, or more.

If you go 360, you "might as well"upgrade the auto to a 71 up unit which has most all the important upgrades Then the modern TC selection is wide open. But I suppose your 65 has the push-buttons.Then I can understand your wanting to keep it.In which case, a 360HO is probably gonna kill it.
And of course, at 350/400 hp, you will need to be kind to the 7.25er.

But I gottasay, if you really want to keep that tranny and the 7.25er, perhaps a low-comp teener is a safe bet.On the other hand a 250hp 360 is easy,peasy, and then your car has a future.
'65 is the first year for column shift or floor shift per government rule. Push buttons were deemed unsafe and '64 the last year. However, '65 was still a cable shifted tranny.
Also, a 400 hp 360 would stress other components like rear end, tranny, and would probably need headers. Building 400 hp cost money also. My Dad has a slant six in his pickup and never uses more than half of its power, nor desires more. Not all of us are impressed with the same things.
Yes, you can build a performance engine to last for miles of street use.... I agree.