Why so much inital timing???

I am not trying to take sides here, but, IMO the camshaft has too late a closing event for that (whatever it is) compression ratio. This is why you can crank in so much initial timing.........essentially why you HAVE to for it to run well.

That's no insult to you or whomever built it, it's just a fact. You could be making more power with either A) more static compression and the same camshaft, or B) a camshaft with an earlier closing event to build more cylinder pressure.

You have 9.6:1 compression and a camshaft with a later IVC, more overlap and more duration @.050" than the factory 340 camshaft in an engine rated at 10.2:1. All those "mores" add up to lower "than could be" cylinder pressure. Those are the facts..

This means that theoretically, your camshaft "should be smaller" (earlier IVC) than the factory 340 camshaft.

That doesn't mean it's a dog. That just explains why you have to have so much initial timing. With a "smaller" (earlier IVC) camshaft, OR more SCR, you would make probably a substantial amount more power, because doing either would raise the DCR.

Just my 2 cents.

With his IVC and compression. Gives him a DCR of right around 8:1. Could there be more? Absolutely. Is it worth it? Ehhhh. I don't think so. What's half a point of DCR worth? 5 horse? And with the headaches of good gas, detonation, pinging, etc etc that comes with max DCR on iron heads. Gotta remember, factory 340 cars had a lot better gas around to run on. He's at sea level, with cali 91 octane, not a recipe for high compression unfourtunately. Given that the builder was aiming for 8:1 DCR, and landed right near it. I think it's a good setup.

I disliked instead of railroading this thread. So much for that...

I never said I was the only one that could put things together. I said I figured it out when you couldn't or wouldn't. You just made the broad statement that "His DCR is too low, he should be at 8:1 to 8.5:1. Which he is at. I'm a details man. Rather than say "You did this wrong". How about you try and figure out if he actually did it wrong first. That's my point.

I'm not derailing anything. I'm giving him actual and intelligent advice. Rather than saying "No you did this wrong". I'm saying "Well this is what you got here, and this is what you got here". See the difference? One is just telling someone they did something wrong. The other is teaching someone. You were already asked to leave this thread by OP. If anyone is derailing anything, it's you.

Just looked at the cam card. IVC is 39* @ .050". Since advertised duration is 275* and @ .050" duration is 231*, does that mean seat IVC is 61* (275-231/2 + 39)? I recalculated SCR again based on notes in my file. Looks like it's right at 9.7:1. Heads are 65.2cc, Pistons are speed pro L2316 with a -7.5 cc volume and are .015" out of the hole. Gaskets are 521SD felpros with 4.18" bore and .054" compressed thickness for a quench distance of .039".

The carb on it now is a 85670 Holley 670 street avenger. It's on the small side since the throttle bore and venturi sizes are the same as an 1850, but I've also got a 650 proform double pumper with throttle bore and venturi sizes of 1-3/8 and 1-11/16. I've also got an old 4-corner idle 4779 to try as well.

Oh good, exact cam specs. Now we should be able to tell you exactly what you got. Using Wallace Racing - Cam Degree Calculator. Your IVC is 61.5

I'm curious how you came to 9.7:1 compression? Punching everything in you came up with on Compression Ratio Calculator - Wallace Racing gives me 10.67:1.

As for carb. If you got a 750 double pumper around. Give that a shot on there. You might be pleasantly surprised.