/6 Exhaust: Dual or single? Your thoughts

Lets examine the slant six (or any American six's firing order) for that matter related to exhaust pulses and scavenging.

1-5-3-6-2-4 is the firing order for every American made inline six........unless some of the new ones are different.

This means that a slant with a 6 into 2 header is perfect for scavenging.

Why? Lets split the front three cylinders and the rear three.

Keep in mind, the firing order, 1-5-3-6-2-4.

See what's going on here? The firing order alternates between the front three and rear three every time a cylinder fires. This means with every firing of a cylinder, exhaust will be scavenged from the opposite cylinder on "the other three".

So, your "theory" is not optimal. This is why a good 6 into two header and into one large exhaust pipe works best here and duals do not.
LOL!! Dude, I've preached & espoused this whole concept a bazillion times(even tho' the 6 into 1 header has dyno'd better), but re-think what was proposed above,......
running a single to the rear then splitting it for the "dual look", the front end of the system(with Dutras' or headers) will already have the correct split/merge incorporated...
.........get it??? Re-splitting it in the rear won't affect the scavenging one iota, it will simply redirect the single stream of gasses down two exits.