/6 to much cam

I ran that same cam w/3.55's & 4.10's, but the real problem was the stock torque converter, get the right one & the gears won't matter so much. BTW, I ran that car year-
round, w/no choke.........yes that included -5deg. starts in PA. Took a handful of start/stalls then pumping & babying, but only the addition of a shroud around the header
& a heated air hose to the air cleaner were needed to make it possible. It sucked, lol, but it worked for 8 years. I limited the mech. advance, ran no vac. adv., and had the
total set at 33deg.......think the initial was around 18deg. My engine ran 9.35:1 compression(static), always idled fine w/an aggressive lope, but never had a die-
out or stalling issue, so please......................more details sir........................

Oh crap, almost forgot the most obvious thing, the valve lash is WAAAAY wider on
the Purple Shafts, .028"/.032" Int./Exh. is the spec. only the smallest /6 cam was
set w/the .010"/.020" lash.
This, right here. The Slant NEEDS a converter or better still, a clutch.
The problem is not what you did, but what the Slant is.
The bore/stroke ratio is much better suited to a lawn tractor than any sort of muscle car application... The rod ratio on the 225 is way too high for any bottom end grunt. Increasing the size of the can and intake only magnifies these shortcomings.
Get that thing up into the 3500 rpm range on launch, and it will become a whole different animal.
Oh, and also, that 500 CFM carb is not too big, but it is jetted way too fat to be happy on a Slant.
Block off the power valve and drop the primary jets down into the 60s.
Taking fuel away will really wake that thing up, with no other changes