Intake manifold flow test. Interesting read!

-
Interesting, glad to see the old LD hanging in there.
when we tested intakes, mounted them port to bench. sucked air through the carb entrance, like it does on engine. they mounted theirs upside down, sucked air through port. backwards of natural flow. one time tested intake port, with port face down on bench . blew air through port. was testing swirl at chamber, it didn't flow as much as testing correct method.
 
when we tested intakes, mounted them port to bench. sucked air through the carb entrance, like it does on engine. they mounted theirs upside down, sucked air through port. backwards of natural flow. one time tested intake port, with port face down on bench . blew air through port. was testing swirl at chamber, it didn't flow as much as testing correct method.
The bench puts out pressurized air and not suction correct. It looks like they did it right.
 
The bench puts out pressurized air and not suction correct. It looks like they did it right.
the flow bench sucks air on intake, blows air on exh. they have plugs in intake ports. to keep air from sucking through. BTW, I flow test on my superflow 600.
 
the flow bench sucks air on intake, blows air on exh. they have plugs in intake ports. to keep air from sucking through. BTW, I flow test on my superflow 600.


At one time there was some lower end flow benches that only flowed air in one direction. To me, that is useless. You have to be able to get the air going both ways like perfacar says. And his is the correct way to test an intake manifold.

That's why this stuff is so expensive. To test things as correctly as you can takes time, the right tools and the sense to use them. That isn't cheap.
 
And the best flowing intake may not work the best. Good general info, one of the worst ways possible to select an intake for a build.
 
interesting read, but I don't like constant flow. An engine is disrupted flow. On the intake side, it's a quick, big, gulp of air and stop! On the exhaust side, it's a quick, blast of shoved air in "pulse style" with a slamming door shut (valve). Intakes and heads truly need to be bolted on an engine for the ultimate in accuracy.
 
interesting read, but I don't like constant flow. An engine is disrupted flow. On the intake side, it's a quick, big, gulp of air and stop! On the exhaust side, it's a quick, blast of shoved air in "pulse style" with a slamming door shut (valve). Intakes and heads truly need to be bolted on an engine for the ultimate in accuracy.
Never thought of it that way.
 
interesting read, but I don't like constant flow. An engine is disrupted flow. On the intake side, it's a quick, big, gulp of air and stop! On the exhaust side, it's a quick, blast of shoved air in "pulse style" with a slamming door shut (valve). Intakes and heads truly need to be bolted on an engine for the ultimate in accuracy.

That is why there is two different lengths for the cross ram, low rpm and higher rpm. tuning the intake runner length for the pulse for either high or low rpm.
 
That is why there is two different lengths for the cross ram, low rpm and higher rpm. tuning the intake runner length for the pulse for either high or low rpm.
tried that thought, had hell of time getting engine set on flow bench. couldn't hook up the bench to intake. gave up on it!! constant flow gives you a measurement of flow. it's accurate. superflow, has a article about that.
 
tried that thought, had hell of time getting engine set on flow bench. couldn't hook up the bench to intake. gave up on it!! constant flow gives you a measurement of flow. it's accurate. superflow, has a article about that.
Have seen a 300 six cyl ford set up to run on three cyl and used the other three as a compressor. sounds like an idea to set up a 8 cyl to use as a flow bench for 4 of them.
 
-
Back
Top