I'd like your thoughts on this 360

Maybe I'm preaching to the choir. Maybe I am wrong.
But this cam has a dual personality. It has slow-rpm characteristics like a 262, so below 2000 or so the late closing intake is a problem. Sure if you have a 2400 TC, and never operate down there, it's no big deal when you floor it; cuz then personality #2 takes over. But then it's,(to ME) a total waste of 2400rpm of the powerband, where probably 80% of my driving occurs, and I have a clutch, so in day to day operation,I demand torque from idle on up. If I need power, that is easy; just rev it up and go. But to me this rpm range from Idle to 3000 is extremely important. That's where my engine lives. This above cam totally wastes about 3 sizes of cam at off idle and this decreases to 2 cam sizes by about 1500/1800, and then 1 cam size to about 2200. So yeah, in an automatic with a 2400TC maybe no big deal, I'll concede the point. Just don't stick it in a low-compression teener with a clutch, cuz you'll be sounding like a Mustang.
But I guess if I had a cam like that, new in a box, I could make a quick sale right here on FABO,lol.
But If I was shopping for a 262, I'd be wanting one about [email protected] would keep the lousy Dcr but increase power by nearly 3 cam sizes,

And if I was shopping for a 204*, I'd be shopping for a [email protected] This cam would pick up the DCr to 7.8@155psi, in a 9.0 teener. And I could keep the 1750 TC and 2.xx gears, if I was so inclined

And finally, if I did install the 262/220 I would be bringing up the compression to take advantage of the low-rpm torque and fuel-efficiency. Yeah that 262/220 can make mileage high into the 20s USg even near or into the 30s with the right final drive ratio.

But hey if I'm wrong I'm sorry, just put me on your ignore list