Vaporizing Fuel w/my Device... Results...
And so would every other magic device made since 1902 'er whenever..............
The problem with, and I have done extensive research, with "other" devices, is either they cannot be mfged for an inexpensive price but work okay, they cannot produce enough hp/torque/fuel mileage savings, etc to be worth mfg, or they just don't work in the entire power band.
I have been trying to vaporize fuel since the late 80's. I came up with another patented device that was too costly to mfg, but worked like a muther. With that one, I started a 360 at 30 degrees, no choke, just turned it on, it was brushless electric motor powered, tapped the gas, hit the key and it started on the fist spark plug ignition and idled with no black smoke, and no more than a tap on the throttle to start it. It didn't hesitate, bog, choke, gag, fart, wheeze or sputter at "all" on take off. But like I said, it was too expensive for mass mfg.
FI has provided the most reliable bang for the buck, sorry for the pun, and is reproducible, as well as reasonably cost effective to mfg.
What I have here, and I'm dying to show you guys, is easily mfged, reliable, stationary so there are no moving parts, and no maintenance. It will never wear out, never break, and the results are enough, I hope, to warrant mfg for carburetion. I haven't been able to test it with a TBFI system yet, but those systems may not benefit enough to use it IDK.
There has been a couple products hit the market, the Tornado comes to mind, but it swirled the air. Swirling air is inefficient because it gives the a/f a longer path to the combustion chamber, slowing the a/f down. This does not slow it down at all, that is why there is a boost, be it a little one, all the way up the power band.
How much might this sustained boost decrease an ET, on this engine, on the above graph? Can anyone take a stab at it?
Thanks!
