Layson Headers

Well, it all started with an article in Hot Rod, which was "10 Steps to Power", and they suggested that on a daily-driven street car, moving down a step in primary header tube size would yield more real-world power on the torque side of things, since focus would not be on top-end on city streets. They suggested on a typical SBC, to move down to 1-1/2" primaries to get that torque at a lower portion of the RPM range, as you mentioned. I agree with this, especially on a 2-barrel powered 273.

I'm not engineer, but wouldn't increasing the primary tube size to something which is larger than the exhaust port equivalent be a detriment to the motor unless, you are going for high rpm?

Matthew
I will kind of side with You on this, but one thing to remember is that exhaust tubing incl. header thin-wall is sized by OD, not ID. So the ID of 1&5/8" header tubes is damn
near 1&1/2" anyway if You want to go by port CA. The other thing to consider is that if You should decide to amp-up the program, a good set of 1&5/8" headers can put
a car like Yours in the low 12's, maybe high 11's,...You know the saying,..do it right once and........................................................