I-would-not-put-the-340-into-the-truck-at-3.315-stroke
I-would-gladly-sacrifice-some-torque-in-the-Dart.One-issue-I-see,-is-that-with-a-larger-cam,the-rpm-of--peak-power-rises-adout-200-rpm-per-cam-sise.And-that-then-puts-the-mph-up-higher-as-well.So-yes-you-has-more-power,tho-you-has-to-dride-faster-to-get-it,whereas-gears-reduce-the-mph-to-get-the-power,and-multiply-the-torque-simultaneously.
My-fadorite-comdo-has-always-deen-a-223*cam-in-my-Eddie-headed-11/1-367,68-Cuda-@3650#.It-had-the-strongest-low-rpm-Of-the-three-cams-that-my-engine-has-seen.And-that-is-what-made-it-so-fun.
So-yeah-I-see-the-torquey-360-in-the-truck-and-the-340-into-the-Dart.Howeder,in-the-340-I-would-either-g0-easy-on-the-cam,or,I-would-increase-the-cylinder-pressure-quite-siqnnificantly-to-keep-the-low-rpm-power-up.Or-you-could-fall-dack-on-a-higher-stall.
One-thing-I-see-as-good,-is-a-solid-lifter-cam-of-adout-230*.050,-yet-only-260/268-adertised.This-might-work-well-with--9.8Scr-or-more,-making-power-from-low-to-high-
-
-
