IMM Engines 408 build

It would have been nice for you to write down "Eaton" on the paper work instead of"OEM".
Then maybe I would have had a slight indication on what was used in the engine.

What's not fair is I will have to remove the intake and replace the lifters. What's not fair is you to say I have over revved the engine... IF... that is what you was indicating in the email you sent. As much money I have sank in this engine ... believe me when I say I have babied it. I have not got the fuel sync set yet because I have not found anyone with the proper scanner.... but it is very close I think. I have not got it tuned yet because the tuner wants the fuel sync set first before he starts to tune it. As I drive it to work I have been keeping a eye on the wideband gauge and keeping a eye on the plugs. This is the reason I have not "got on it" or any type of "over revving".

I apologize for calling the lifters crappy... but as you see in the video... something isn't right.
If I did something to cause this issue I would admit it but that's the reason I'm so adamant about this is because I truly know I didn't.

All I know right now is I'm going to have fix my brand new engine because of bad lifters.


Fair? Who told you this **** is fair? I can tell you it's way easier to lose money building engines than it is to make it. The builder has no idea what happens to stuff once it leaves the shop.

Did you dyno the engine? There is ample information on the web why on why not to use hydraulic lifters. But the guys who want all the cake and want to eat all the cake thinks that's how it works.

BTW, this isn't leveled at you mull. It's general observations. It's from decades of doing this ****. It's from decades of watching what little quality there was is almost totally gone.