Tall Girls or Short Girls: Preference?

-
dibbons

dibbons

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
5,722
Reaction score
3,784
Location
La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico
I think 5 foot 3 inches is about the "cutest" height, but when dating I guess I would have taken just about any size girl that gave me a phone number.

The 5' 3" listing below includes Elizabeth Taylor, Bo Derek, Barbara Eden, Annette Funicello, Barbra Streisand, Linda Ronstadt, Sarah Jessica Parker, (Jodie Foster) need I go on ... ?

"Team" fotos:
List of Celebrities who are 5' 3" (160 cm) tall - FamousFix List

Mills.jpg
 
Skinny girls. The closer the the bone, the sweeter the meat.

That what broiler farmers say anyway!?

All the city boys do know what a broiler is? right?
 
I prefer small hands and feet. so I guess short.
 
The shorter the better. BUT

Barbra Streisand and Sarah Jessica Parker? Not even with yours. YIKES
111.jpg
 
My bride of 32 years is 5ft 2 with eyes of blue.
Perfect
 
Hey that's funny; some girls have longer legs than others even at the same height.
I met a nice girl once about 4.5 decades ago, who at 64", and in a dress looked perfectly normal.
But on the next date, in jeans now, the jig was up. Those legs were really short. Call me shallow but I moved on.
 
T&A. Height was never an issue, but a tall whisp with no tits? Ha, who am I kidding......
 
Those girls I listed are not my personal choices (well, a few were), I just threw some examples out there (to each his own).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top