Recommended 4bbl carb for stock 318

-
That’s good its already got the exhaust upgraded to a dual as it would be a waste opening up the intake end with a 4bbl and still having it choked up with a single exhaust.

As others have said, if you want to keep it simple yet get an increase in performance, get a 1406.

I upgraded mine two years ago and wish I did it a few years earlier!

LD4B installation on a 75 318
 
That’s good its already got the exhaust upgraded to a dual as it would be a waste opening up the intake end with a 4bbl and still having it choked up with a single exhaust.

As others have said, if you want to keep it simple yet get an increase in performance, get a 1406.

I upgraded mine two years ago and wish I did it a few years earlier!

LD4B installation on a 75 318
A LD4B (or similar manifold) a 600 carb and dual exhaust makes a difference with 318's.
 
A LD4B (or similar manifold) a 600 carb and dual exhaust makes a difference with 318's.
Take the stock point distributor and convert it to Mopar electronic or throw on a Pertronix.
 
A LD4B (or similar manifold) a 600 carb and dual exhaust makes a difference with 318's.

Oh and I bought a recurved distributor from Trailbeast so it no longer has the slow advance. It runs great now.
 
I've done some searching and there seems to be a lot opinions, but they all seem to be leaning towards max power. And for the most part using newer or large older carbs but I've been trying to fine a happy medium with near stock parts.
Before the 2bbl went back on there were long tube headers and an 850cfm double pump holley, ridiculous for what's there and what I'm looking for which brings me to now.
So the 2BBL runs well that I put on as a temporary carb until I worked out this 4bbl idea.
And now the only reason I'm looking to upgrade is I've also got that 4bbl intake and was wondering what would be best for my situation.
Currently the car is a 73' Duster Twister with a stock 318 with stock exhaust manifolds and stock 2bbl intake manifold. The only changes that have been made are a dual 2.5'' dual exhaust and a high flow air filter housing, with deleted vac lines and intake heater from the exhaust manifold. I'm not entirely sure what the 4bbl intake manifold is from (340 or 360) but it has the same stampings in the same places for firing order, cylinder numbers and rotation.
What I am looking for is low cost, better fuel economy, and extra power is always good. I'm not sure which size and model would be best, It was suggested that I use a 350cfm but said nothing else about it, another said to avoid Carter yet a third said to avoid Holley? So which is it? People say to avoid either one? My initial thought was a 450cfm Carter
I don't know for sure, and that's why I'm looking for some help. So what I am looking for is low cost, better fuel economy, and extra power?

Thanks
Chad
What did you end up with?
Performer intake and carb @ 600 cfm?
 
And I bet it runs great and get's decent mileage.
The 1406 Edelbrock is perfect. It's a 600 CFM carburetor, yes, but it is lean because it is tuned for economy. The 1405 is the performance version and would be a little fat. I would use the 1406 all day long, because it leaves some wiggle room if you add upgrades later on. It will work fine.
Hey, Sorry I've been away for a bit.
First I should start of by saying, thanks for the input.
And I was actually hoping to find a period correct carb that would have been used on small block Mopar's and had reasonable reliability, power and economy. I am aware that 1973 318's never had 4bbl's and that the Carter BBD was the best option for 2bbl, but I'm hoping to maintain the look of a stock small block with a bit more power.
Also, it seem everyone has the input of jumping to a high CFM compared to a big 2bbl or smaller 4bbl. I didn't realize this was the goal is size for power and economy, I would have expected around 400CFM. I do have a Holley 850 Double pumper.... I wish I had a cam and pistons and intake for that thing.
So why 600CFM? Is there much gain in horse power and economy over a 400CFM?
Also there seems to be a discrepancy in the Edlebrock that most are happy but one said they can ice up? I do live in a cold climate so in the winter I do start it up every so often to keep everything lubed. Has anyone else had this kind of issue?, I never seen this on a stock carb, so I can only assume it's due to thin aluminum?
And on top of all that I really need the cost to be as low as possible and still get quality.

Thanks
Chad
 
What price would you be paying for a 400cfm carb and what would it be for a 600cfm carb? You looking at new or used? If the 400cfm is cheaper, buy it.

You’re asking for something that will be fast, cheap and reliable. All three together do not exist. You have to choose 2 of the 3; which two are most important to you?

Not sure where in Nova Scotia you are but it’s not as cold there as on the prairies. I’m on the west coast and haven’t had issues with my 600cfm, nor the stock 2bbl it had before. When I had my Scamp in Edmonton for a few years, the 2bbl handled the winters alright. Any car, even modern ones, are not going to run well in -25 to -40 until they are warmed up.
 
Hey, Sorry I've been away for a bit.
First I should start of by saying, thanks for the input.
And I was actually hoping to find a period correct carb that would have been used on small block Mopar's and had reasonable reliability, power and economy. I am aware that 1973 318's never had 4bbl's and that the Carter BBD was the best option for 2bbl, but I'm hoping to maintain the look of a stock small block with a bit more power.
Also, it seem everyone has the input of jumping to a high CFM compared to a big 2bbl or smaller 4bbl. I didn't realize this was the goal is size for power and economy, I would have expected around 400CFM. I do have a Holley 850 Double pumper.... I wish I had a cam and pistons and intake for that thing.
So why 600CFM? Is there much gain in horse power and economy over a 400CFM?
Also there seems to be a discrepancy in the Edlebrock that most are happy but one said they can ice up? I do live in a cold climate so in the winter I do start it up every so often to keep everything lubed. Has anyone else had this kind of issue?, I never seen this on a stock carb, so I can only assume it's due to thin aluminum?
And on top of all that I really need the cost to be as low as possible and still get quality.

Thanks
Chad
I would offer you the previous carburetor and the intake it came off of for $50 + shipping. Not sure if that helps ya or if your even interested. Just thought I would offer it in case you might wanna try it. Proly kinda expensive on shipping but I have no clue as never shipped parts before.
 
Quadrajet replacement? Is there a number on the front of the air horn?

4360 R-7456

IIRC Buick may have used it OEM for tiny V8's in the gas crunch days. I have an almost NOS one on the wall for a 273 build but it may stay there....EFI.
 
Hey, Sorry I've been away for a bit.
First I should start of by saying, thanks for the input.
And I was actually hoping to find a period correct carb that would have been used on small block Mopar's and had reasonable reliability, power and economy. I am aware that 1973 318's never had 4bbl's and that the Carter BBD was the best option for 2bbl, but I'm hoping to maintain the look of a stock small block with a bit more power.
Also, it seem everyone has the input of jumping to a high CFM compared to a big 2bbl or smaller 4bbl. I didn't realize this was the goal is size for power and economy, I would have expected around 400CFM. I do have a Holley 850 Double pumper.... I wish I had a cam and pistons and intake for that thing.
So why 600CFM? Is there much gain in horse power and economy over a 400CFM?
Also there seems to be a discrepancy in the Edlebrock that most are happy but one said they can ice up? I do live in a cold climate so in the winter I do start it up every so often to keep everything lubed. Has anyone else had this kind of issue?, I never seen this on a stock carb, so I can only assume it's due to thin aluminum?
And on top of all that I really need the cost to be as low as possible and still get quality.

Thanks
Chad

Chad, you have been given the best answers already. IMO, the Edebrock Performer intake and 600 cfm carb will work the best unless you just favor a Holley carb. Been there done that. This statement from you is the deal sealer for what you want. It is what I use and have been using for a long time.
"And on top of all that I really need the cost to be as low as possible and still get quality."

Of course, you can try old, used, swap meet parts ......

A 400 cfm carb will work OK, this will leave the engine short of breath when the rpm's clime high. A 600 cfm carb covers this top end rpm area. Also the primary side is larger but not a waste since it also allows the engine to breath much nicer. Any carb can ice up and if the fella above had issues, he will need to look into WHY! and not just complaon about it. I live where temps an fall below zero F* height degrees and I haven't had any problems with MY AFB's once the engine is warmed up.

I wouldn't use the 850 Holley but, do what ever ya want. I feel like your beating a dead horse here.
 
You're getting answers from people who have done exactly what you are about to do, used the 1406 600 and had great success. THAT'S the WHY as to the answers you're getting. You couldn't be getting better answers. From actual experience. You cannot just "go grab a 600 carburetor" and slap it on. The 1406 is a very specific carburetor for specifically mild applications, like yours, and it metered to work on a pretty wide range of engine sizes, because of a well known scientific term called volumetric efficiency.

We're not telling you to go get a 600. We're telling you to get a 1406. BIG difference.
 
Chad, you have been given the best answers already. IMO, the Edebrock Performer intake and 600 cfm carb will work the best unless you just favor a Holley carb. Been there done that. This statement from you is the deal sealer for what you want. It is what I use and have been using for a long time.
"And on top of all that I really need the cost to be as low as possible and still get quality."

Of course, you can try old, used, swap meet parts ......

A 400 cfm carb will work OK, this will leave the engine short of breath when the rpm's clime high. A 600 cfm carb covers this top end rpm area. Also the primary side is larger but not a waste since it also allows the engine to breath much nicer. Any carb can ice up and if the fella above had issues, he will need to look into WHY! and not just complaon about it. I live where temps an fall below zero F* height degrees and I haven't had any problems with MY AFB's once the engine is warmed up.

I wouldn't use the 850 Holley but, do what ever ya want. I feel like your beating a dead horse here.
You're getting answers from people who have done exactly what you are about to do, used the 1406 600 and had great success. THAT'S the WHY as to the answers you're getting. You couldn't be getting better answers. From actual experience. You cannot just "go grab a 600 carburetor" and slap it on. The 1406 is a very specific carburetor for specifically mild applications, like yours, and it metered to work on a pretty wide range of engine sizes, because of a well known scientific term called volumetric efficiency.

We're not telling you to go get a 600. We're telling you to get a 1406. BIG difference.


Now now, relax I was merely tying to find how people felt about the stock ones and which might have been under those conditions.

So.... with the input you guys have I will be going with the 4106 and not the 4105 simply because it's not going to be doing much highway cruising other than shows and stuff, just mainly city driving on the weekend and nice nights to have fun with it. I guess now the only thing that could change that is a crazy deal on something else
I do have a 340 intake to use with it and keep the Mopar look. The 850 I have was just a joke (way to big, obviously), it came from one of my grandfathers old motors. As it is, I would have only suggested a holley for the look because Mopar often used holley. But my understanding is holley's are hard to setup, tune, and rebuild if needed. Also I didn't mean a super cold climate just one that does go below freezing 0c for about 3 months and sometime below -20c, nothing like the prairies though... that can get real cold.
 
Bangs head on table.... Un-watching the thread...

I need a beer, where’s Ben drinkin....
 
So it's safe to say the Edlebrock 4106 is the best overall carb based on tried and true methods by Mopar guys who have used this carb against other carbs (from stock to upgraded aftermarket). So anyone else out there who decides to check into this option don't go any farther. I'm new to these aftermarket upgrades for carbs and I had always used original or remanded for stock.
But with the cost of gas going up and carb costs going down it's time to change.
And really, who else knows better on what to use other than someone who has used this particular carb. The majority of input from these guys is amazing for parts, tuning and repair. And most here know their stuff well.
So thanks guys, I know where my path is headed now with no concern for workability because of the good input.

Thanks
Keep it blue
 
Since the 1406, not the 4106 as you keep typing is an AFB carburetor, it looks pretty stock on a Mopar, since Mopar used the AFB probably more than the Holley.
 
[/QUOTE]
Bangs head on table.... Un-watching the thread...
I need a beer, where's Ben drinkin....

What's the problem?
Is it wrong to sum up?
Your info was a big part of the sway for sure....
And sorry I did mean 1406 and not the 4106 thanks for pointing that out. And sorry I assumed that holly was the most used for Mopar
And with all the new carbs and new companies out there, I just thought I would ask for the input

And here I go with another known question.
I just want to ask for curiosity.
I'm going to be using the 340 intake have simply because it's been refurbished and in my hands.
But... Is there any difference in the intake manifold for the 340 and the 360 manifold?
I've been told the 340 has a better flow which is why I picked one up, but I would think the 360 would be better for larger size engine?
Thanks
 
I was never a big fan of the Holleys the oem's used. Single pump with a metering block and transfer tube. AFB/AVS is much simpler imo.
 
Last edited:
I've done some searching and there seems to be a lot opinions, but they all seem to be leaning towards max power. And for the most part using newer or large older carbs but I've been trying to fine a happy medium with near stock parts.
Before the 2bbl went back on there were long tube headers and an 850cfm double pump holley, ridiculous for what's there and what I'm looking for which brings me to now.
So the 2BBL runs well that I put on as a temporary carb until I worked out this 4bbl idea.
And now the only reason I'm looking to upgrade is I've also got that 4bbl intake and was wondering what would be best for my situation.
Currently the car is a 73' Duster Twister with a stock 318 with stock exhaust manifolds and stock 2bbl intake manifold. The only changes that have been made are a dual 2.5'' dual exhaust and a high flow air filter housing, with deleted vac lines and intake heater from the exhaust manifold. I'm not entirely sure what the 4bbl intake manifold is from (340 or 360) but it has the same stampings in the same places for firing order, cylinder numbers and rotation.
What I am looking for is low cost, better fuel economy, and extra power is always good. I'm not sure which size and model would be best, It was suggested that I use a 350cfm but said nothing else about it, another said to avoid Carter yet a third said to avoid Holley? So which is it? People say to avoid either one? My initial thought was a 450cfm Carter
I don't know for sure, and that's why I'm looking for some help. So what I am looking for is low cost, better fuel economy, and extra power?

Thanks
Chad
An alternative to post #7:
is to gear it up, and a bit more TC.
Once you have a 4bbl on it, you are gonna use it, and if you can't tune it properly, it's gonna drink gas. With stock 2.76 type gears and a stock 1800ish TC, it ain't gonna wake up much on the bottom..... unless you can spin both tires a good ways out.
2) If it doesn't spin
then the carb is gonna make a buncha noise but won't actually start pulling until the engine can actually use the cfm.Which is gonna be about 3000rpm when the primaries start to run out. You cannot make the carb jam 600cfm into the engine. The cam and induction system together with the cfm and rpm control how much air is gonna go into the engine. So if you have a 300 cfm primary, it's good to about 3000rpm, probably more. You can double the carb size and the engine will not make 1 horsepower more than it did on the primaries. And the worst part is 3000 rpm is about 34 mph with 2.76s and a 904.
3) If it does spin just one, it will wear out the spider gears, and eventually blow up.
4) If it spins both but only for 1or 2 car-lengths, your back at sub 3000 rpm and then you are back to paragraph two.
So the absolute most more power that a 4bbl will get you is maybe 12 hp, say 15 with dual exhaust. And this won't happen until maybe 3800/4000 rpm,and 44 mph.
Ok now at 1800rpm, your approximate stall speed, let's say your 318 can muster 140 ftlbs. Your transmission and rear gear will multiply this to 140x2.45x2.76=947 ftlbs, into the rear axles. It doesn't matter if you have a 4bbl or not, 947 is all it's gonna make. And 947 will not spin two tires not even skinny ones.
But if you put a 3.23 in there, then you will get 140x2.45x3.23=1108 ftlbs, or ~17% more. And still on the primaries, but now,3000rpm is 29mph.
Ok but say you also put a 2400 TC in there and now your 318 spools up to say 240 ftlbs. Ok so now, on the start line, she is gonna put down; 240x2.45x3.23=1900ftlbs into the rear axle, still on the primaries if it doesn't spin. This is an increase of 100%.......... Hyup double the ftlbs, and still on the primaries. Your cruise rpm will increase from 2250 to 2600, or the same difference as your rear gear increase, in percent. With a 2400TC your fuel mileage will only decrease by about one half the rpm difference in per cent (or about 8.5% loss) which maths out to about 2mpgs. Or you can slow down to 2250 and break even, not factoring in wind resistance.
But wait! 1900ftlbs is enough torque to spin both rear tires now, so be sure to install a SureGrip.
If you leave the 2.76s in there and go with a 2600TC, Maybe your 2bbl teener can make 260ftlbs, and the math comes to 260x2.45x2.76=1758 into the axles on the start line, still enough to spin both tires. Your cruise rpm at zero-slip would be 2250, but I can't say how much fuel will get burned up in the 2600TC loafing.
But, there's still the 2.94 rear gear that will cruise at 65=2374@zero slip, so now the 2400TC is bang-on for cruising 65. Back to 240 ftlbs@2400, the math looks like; 240x2.45x2.94=1730 ftlbs, still enough to spin two tires and an increase in starting line torque of 82.5% from original . And it's still a 2bbl.
A 4bbl will not touch this performance increase.In fact the secondaries may not pull in 8 horsepower until 3000rpm which would be an increase of 14ftlbs. But say you got both tires spinning and whacked the secondaries open and hit 3800 at WOT, right there, two feet from the starting line; now you get the full 15hp from the secondaries.....which is 21ftlbs;yippee!! But say your teener actually somehow manages to make an extra 25hp at 3800, on the secondaries, what's that worth? 34 ftlbs.
But say you put a cam in there too, and now you make 50 horsepower more but now at 4400 rpm; what's that worth? 60ftlbs at 4400. How about at 3800? not a whole bunch less. These are the peak numbers, not the stall numbers.But don't try this with 2.76s and the 1800TC cuz it will be a total dog off the line, unless you simultaneously increase the compression.
You can see how none of these torque numbers; 14/21/34/or60, hold a candle to gears and especially TC.

The TC can increase the stall-torque, from say 20% to say 100% depending on the numbers. If your engine is capable of generating 280ftlbs at 3800, but only makes 140 at 1800, that is a difference of 100%; so just pick what you need; enough to spin but not so much as to totally ruin your fuel mileage.
From 2.76 to 2.94 to 3.23 to 3.55 are all increasing in about 9.5% steps, so your starting-line torque will increase by the percent difference, and you can add them. Going one size at a time and working off 140 ftlbs@1800, the torque increases would math out to 13.3/26.6/40 ftlbs

The engine torque numbers I quoted are for illustrative purposes only and may bear no resemblance to your engine..... but the % torque increases are relative and so will still be pretty close.
Seriously, I personally can't wait for the power increase to begin in earnest until past 30mph with 2.76s, so the 4bbl is mostly good for passing, unless you hold it in gear to like 4500, so I hope your teener is up to the task.
My recommendation remains TC and gears, to get the power right on the start-line.

If you decide to make it a 4bbl, do yourself a favor. Do some 2bbl first-gear time trials from a dead stop to say 4000 rpm. Then after the 4bbl is on, repeat and compare.
 
Last edited:
An alternative to post #7:
is to gear it up, and a bit more TC.
Once you have a 4bbl on it, you are gonna use it, and if you can't tune it properly, it's gonna drink gas. With stock 2.76 type gears and a stock 1800ish TC, it ain't gonna wake up much on the bottom..... unless you can spin both tires a good ways out.
2) If it doesn't spin
then the carb is gonna make a buncha noise but won't actually start pulling until the engine can actually use the cfm.Which is gonna be about 3000rpm when the primaries start to run out. You cannot make the carb jam 600cfm into the engine. The cam and induction system together with the cfm and rpm control how much air is gonna go into the engine. So if you have a 300 cfm primary, it's good to about 3000rpm, probably more. You can double the carb size and the engine will not make 1 horsepower more than it did on the primaries. And the worst part is 3000 rpm is about 34 mph with 2.76s and a 904.
3) If it does spin just one, it will wear out the spider gears, and eventually blow up.
4) If it spins both but only for 1or 2 car-lengths, your back at sub 3000 rpm and then you are back to paragraph two.
So the absolute most more power that a 4bbl will get you is maybe 12 hp, say 15 with dual exhaust. And this won't happen until maybe 3800/4000 rpm,and 44 mph.
Ok now at 1800rpm, your approximate stall speed, let's say your 318 can muster 140 ftlbs. Your transmission and rear gear will multiply this to 140x2.45x2.76=947 ftlbs, into the rear axles. It doesn't matter if you have a 4bbl or not, 947 is all it's gonna make. And 947 will not spin two tires not even skinny ones.
But if you put a 3.23 in there, then you will get 140x2.45x3.23=1108 ftlbs, or ~17% more. And still on the primaries, but now,3000rpm is 29mph.
Ok but say you also put a 2400 TC in there and now your 318 spools up to say 240 ftlbs. Ok so now, on the start line, she is gonna put down; 240x2.45x3.23=1900ftlbs into the rear axle, still on the primaries if it doesn't spin. This is an increase of 100%.......... Hyup double the ftlbs, and still on the primaries. Your cruise rpm will increase from 2250 to 2600, or the same difference as your rear gear increase, in percent. With a 2400TC your fuel mileage will only decrease by about one half the rpm difference in per cent (or about 8.5% loss) which maths out to about 2mpgs. Or you can slow down to 2250 and break even, not factoring in wind resistance.
But wait! 1900ftlbs is enough torque to spin both rear tires now, so be sure to install a SureGrip.
If you leave the 2.76s in there and go with a 2600TC, Maybe your 2bbl teener can make 260ftlbs, and the math comes to 260x2.45x2.76=1758 into the axles on the start line, still enough to spin both tires. Your cruise rpm at zero-slip would be 2250, but I can't say how much fuel will get burned up in the 2600TC loafing.
But, there's still the 2.94 rear gear that will cruise at 65=2374@zero slip, so now the 2400TC is bang-on for cruising 65. Back to 240 ftlbs@2400, the math looks like; 240x2.45x2.94=1730 ftlbs, still enough to spin two tires and an increase in starting line torque of 82.5% from original . And it's still a 2bbl.
A 4bbl will not touch this performance increase.In fact the secondaries may not pull in 8 horsepower until 3000rpm which would be an increase of 14ftlbs. But say you got both tires spinning and whacked the secondaries open and hit 3800 at WOT, right there, two feet from the starting line; now you get the full 15hp from the secondaries.....which is 21ftlbs;yippee!! But say your teener actually somehow manages to make an extra 25hp at 3800, on the secondaries, what's that worth? 34 ftlbs.
But say you put a cam in there too, and now you make 50 horsepower more but now at 4400 rpm; what's that worth? 60ftlbs at 4400. How about at 3800? not a whole bunch less. These are the peak numbers, not the stall numbers.But don't try this with 2.76s and the 1800TC cuz it will be a total dog off the line, unless you simultaneously increase the compression.
You can see how none of these torque numbers; 14/21/34/or60, hold a candle to gears and especially TC.

The TC can increase the stall-torque, from say 20% to say 100% depending on the numbers. If your engine is capable of generating 280ftlbs at 3800, but only makes 140 at 1800, that is a difference of 100%; so just pick what you need; enough to spin but not so much as to totally ruin your fuel mileage.
From 2.76 to 2.94 to 3.23 to 3.55 are all increasing in about 9.5% steps, so your starting-line torque will increase by the percent difference, and you can add them. Going one size at a time and working off 140 ftlbs@1800, the torque increases would math out to 13.3/26.6/40 ftlbs

The engine torque numbers I quoted are for illustrative purposes only and may bear no resemblance to your engine..... but the % torque increases are relative and so will still be pretty close.
Seriously, I personally can't wait for the power increase to begin in earnest until past 30mph with 2.76s, so the 4bbl is mostly good for passing, unless you hold it in gear to like 4500, so I hope your teener is up to the task.
My recommendation remains TC and gears, to get the power right on the start-line.

If you decide to make it a 4bbl, do yourself a favor. Do some 2bbl first-gear time trials from a dead stop to say 4000 rpm. Then after the 4bbl is on, repeat and compare.

Thank you,
Very nice write up,
And now I think I already have a direction on the rest of the parts combo.
I may be new to carb upgrades, but using this explanation is very helpful to determine the end result.
I still plan on a Edlebrock 1406 for the carb with the stock 340 intake. As for gears it's good to know where to aim in the range. I didn't know the stock 2.73 had limited slip I assumed they were an open differential which would only spin 1 wheel, but I do plan on an upgrade there as well. And I do have the 904A Tranny that has about 300mi/500km on the rebuild also I'm not sure what the torque converter spec is but it was replaced as well. In the future I plan on putting in a mild cam that will work well with the 1406, cam, and now the rear gear and converter. I'm hoping in the end to get the a good combo of these upgrades and that will be all I need for all future driving.

 
The 625 street demon may also be a good carb, I ran one on a stock 318 for a few years, it has small primary which help with throttle response and mileage.

I have had no issues with this carb, but you do have to buy the mopar throttle rod, because the stock one off the 2bbl will not work.

Demon Carburetion Street Demon Carburetors 1901
 
What is you alls opinion on a street demon carb for a stockish 318?
 
-
Back
Top