Tubular control arms vs rebushing

This is a good point. Subjectively, the stock parts work and work well. The ride is comfortable in stock suspension cars and usually, they track well and do what you want them to do.

Once you need to make an evasive maneuver or brake hard, that assessment can change. They wallow, sway and roll in extremely non-productive ways.

If nothing else, these cars need new alignment specs as they were originally set up for bias ply tires or really primitive radials.



How about “save your time?” This is the choice that each of us has to make. If you don’t rely on your car for transportation, if you’re comfortable with pressing out ball joints/bushings, etc...yeah. It probably makes sense to refresh the stock components.

Personally, I chose tubular control arms. The uppers provided alignment benefits, the lowers saved a little weight and didn’t require welding in reinforcement plates for higher traction use. QA1 pieces went in without a hitch and saved me a ton of time even if it cost more money, no regrets.
All of this is where my mind is leading me. If the parts go in easily, I could be done with it with a minimum of down time and not having to get a press...play with getting the old bushings out..
Kinda seems like a one and done thing tjatllt still be in good shape in a few years.

Otherwise, if I don't go the tubular route, I would have to get a list together of 'might as wells'