265 hemi straight six
@slantsixdan - the only thing nutty in my humble opinion is your over the top insulting response.
Say thoughtless (there, y'see? I'm being diplomatic per your request!) things in public, and sooner or later someone might comment on it. Might even point and laugh! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Don't like it? Block whoever's postings y'don't wanna see (it's rilly easy). Throwing a tantrum about their posting style is pretty much guaranteed to do the opposite of what you want.
Nope. Made y'self look silly 'n' ignert, is what you did. None of this is any skin off my nose.
But to be quite frank, externally, the engine bears a strong resemblance to that family of GM 6's
That's not what you said, though. You said you're super-triple-intergalactic dead certain it's
nothing more than a rebadged GM 265 inline six. Quote-unquote. But I guess your fingers must have accidentally slipped and you really meant to talk about resemblance.
Don't look now, but from a couple hunnerd feet away, your Valiant bears a strong resemblance to an American or a Falcon or a Nova, too, so I guess I'm doomed (
DOOOOOOOOOOOMED!) to go to my grave thinking it's an American or a Falcon or a Nova or something, if I should ever find myself with occasion to think about your Valiant.
I was already well aware of the history you referenced.
Yep, it totally shows and stuff: you knew fully well it's a Chrysler motor, you were just, um,
testing us to see if
we knew! That's why you carried on about how gol-dang sure you are that it's really a rebadged GM motor! Ha, ha! Right, guys?
…guys?
…right?
(Shh-shh…listen…what's that sound? Sounds like…backpedalling!)
Hope you'll consider being more civil in any future rebuttals.
You said "Butt".
