360 magnum. 1 piston lower in cylinder??

He said that he would not trust the block of crank. I don't want to doubt his expertise but man this engine sure looks solid. I guess the previous owner could have been BSing me and yanked it before it let loose. It's almost completely apart so I guess a magnaflux of the crank and block would answer that. Correct?

AJ....good info on my LA360
Your assumptions are pretty good. Not sure about the 106* cam install. I believe it was straight up.
I am also not sure about the piston to deck height. I bought this motor rebuilt and have about 8000 miles on it. I tore it down when I got it but did not pay much attention to the pistons. They are definitely..030 and flat tops with no valve relief.
I also forgot to mention that i milled my heads .030. With that said 8.5 is what I estimated as well. Also my converter is actually 2500 and the tires barely spin.

I was really hoping to take advantage of the Magnum's rollers and 1.6 rockers.
Another option is to keep my La360 and use the EQs with the closed chambers upping my CR a bit and add cam but that's about the same scenario I have now.
As for the block, I did not think of that. It is possible that a hairline crack could have been formed if the rod was bent due to coolant getting into the cylinder and the cylinder hydro-locking...seen it before. A pressure test of the block is an alternative way to find that... And magnafluxing the crank is not what I would do.... check it for straightness and indexing first. If it is off, then replacing may be the easiest route... again, consult with your shop on that.

OK on the present LA360. With the flat top pistons and no eyebrows, I suspect they are about .100-.110" in the hole and are stock replacements. With the heads milled .030" and that piston and stock Felpro heads gaskets, then the SCR is around 8.3 so are about right. No way that the cranking pressures will be 170 psi unless the cam is all hosed up and waaaaay advanced, like 2 or 3 teeth (40-45 degrees)! And the lack of tire spin attests to that.... though the rear gear is not helping, the TC should compensate some for that tall gear if you had a true high compression engine.

Possible changes in order of increasing SCR:
While I would not kill for 1.6 rockers, they are an advantage. I became a believer with a 351 Cleveland; the stock 1.73 ratio made it sooo easy to get good lift with small duration. Better for low RPM torque. My son and I went with 1.6 shaft rockers on his 340 for that reason.