Valve to piston clearance?

OK just asking, but
302 heads are the fast-burns right?
If that's right, then you are so close to having a tight-Q situation, all you need to do is get the pistons a little closer to the top of the bores and run the .028 gasket.
IIRC the KB 167s will get you close to -.012. That plus the .028s will get you .040 about as good as it gets.
With the tight-Q comes a more efficient design,. Usually followed by a snappier engine and a little more low-rpm torque. This is usually followed by more mpgs, because you cn run a little less gear and not so much TC..
Now your Q-situation totals .030 plus .039=.069; Which with closed-chamber heads, I have read/heard , is possibly inviting detonation.
If it was my project, I concentrate on the either more Q or less but , I have heard that the troublesome zone is .050 to .080, and at .069 you would be right in the middle of it.
This is good info!!
So getting the piston closer to the head would reduce the risk of detonation?? You lost me there. I'm sorry I dont know much about quench and detonation yet. I'm just shooting for a 9:5 scr and the combo above is how I got there.
You are correct about the 167s and as much as I'd love to go that route they are out of my price range.