A tale of 2 cams

Ironmike said
I've attached a pic of specs from 2 cams. 2 different companies. As you can see, they are damn near twins. Except for the lobe separation angle and intake centerline.

I was hoping someone could REALLY tell me how these 2 cams might be so different.
Which one has more overlap?
Which one would have a higher reversion tendency?
Which would build more cranking compression?

I never did quite get the LSA and ICL thing. At least how they would change the characteristics of the cam...

Given the choice of these two, which would you run?
View attachment 1715261210

106 vs 108 LSA
And
100 vs 104 Intake center

The LSA is ground into the cam,
can’t change that. Just being realistic, I very much doubt that anyone would be able to tell the difference of a 2 degree shift.
Both are on the narrow end of the LSA spectrum, so both would have some overlap. For reference a LSA of 110 and up would be on the wide end of the overlap spectrum.
The Intake centerline can be adjusted when the cam is installed.
Called ‘degreeing a cam’ so either cam could be installed at either ICL.